ZZZZZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzz:tired All the same predictable responses, bit of originality hey you thick ****.
Is your issue with billy that you don't think he's done a good job training burns or that his gameplan was wrong?
I know this is hard to fathom for some of you thicko's, but I don't like him, he's a fat jock for one, two, he came on here and said Burns beat Beltran by 2 rounds after the fight, only to announce his retirement from here because there were that many people who were giving him ****. Just don't like how he operates, got no time for bullshitters.
Which explains why he was a bit too over zealous to get on here and announce how the better man won when Crawford took Burns to school, because Billy knows quite well what he was up to after the Beltran fight. On ****ing SKY tele with the Jock crowd silent as **** knowing their man had been well and truly wupped, Jim Watt, fast car and worst of Blobby Nelson waffling copious amounts of ****. ****ing embarrassing. I hope this answers all your questions.
first thing, i have been in zero world title fights!!!if thats the criteria for being on a boxing forum then you will be chatting to yourself on here! and you will have a lot more time on your hands!!maybe spend some of it on a tread mill or training Burns to get in range to land a punch!! secondly , i am not gloating in any way that Burns got beat (which should have been his hat-trick on the bounce), i merely pointed out that Burns fought in EXACTLY the same way as the 2 fights before but you made out the only reason for his poor performances was due to injury etc i understand why you are touchy but your anger and frustration will pass with time billy until one day you will accept x
Ah yes Burns has got this far without being able to get in range hasnt he.. Just why should this have been his 3rd defeat on the bounce? Ohhh you still nullify his stoppage of Gonzalez as he wasnt winning the fight on the cards at that point?? If only fights lasted 6 rounds you might have a point...guess Froch didnt beat Taylor either (to name one of lots of fights where someone behind on the cards at the time, stopped the other bloke, Mcdonnell v Wood just weeks ago being another)
:deal The folk who gone on about Gonzalez beating Burns need to give it a rest. It's a 12 round fight FFS.
i dunno why you bring Froch into it,you are obsessed.... Burns got smashed all over by gonzalez and he quit on his stool...motwyw Burns got smashed all over by Beltran and got a draw.....complete joke Burns got schooled by Crawford in front of his home fans and lost at least 8 rounds.... in all 3 fights he was out of range stretching for shots leaving his jaw wide open and even got it broken in one of them fights if you want to argue with that then you are simply wrong
oh and it didnt seem a little strange that a man well ahead on points just quits??? oh i forgot ' ricky broke his heart' megalolz
You're doing the exact same thing... as if you'd say that **** to my face you ****ing plum.. haha If you seen me face to face you would saying 'oh I know you was just having a bit of banter mate, please don't hit me, pleeeaaaaseeeee no... NOOOOOOOOOOOOOO' :yikes
Obsessed with Froch, how so? Is it not relevant to my point? I also mentioned another fight yet im not obsessed on either of thos fighters? Enlighten me as to the criteria required to be 'obsessed' please... Burns got smashed all over-erm slight exaggeration to say the least, god knows what the collection of letters means after that but the facts speak for themsleves, Burns WON. Gonzalez quit. So how should this be 3 defeats on the bounce?? Yuo are basically saying if a fighter is ahead on the cards before being stopped he is the actual winner? So Groves beat Froch then, again to name one of many? (couldnt resist, im obsessed-though not sure what with) And what am i wrong about exactly, that Burns beat Gonzalez or the fact im 'wrong' to want to note my opinion on a forum-which is designed for such purposes?
I am when I'm sat behind me computer giving **** ooouuuuttt... hahaha Look at me go.... wooooohhh :bbb