The "All Things Mayweather/Pacquiao" Express!!!!!!

Thats his opinion maybe is because he favours the brawler more as it matches Haglers style.

 

thats his style. he went on vacation to avoid margarito and cotto. he even waited more than a year to fight mosley when he beat margarito. then *****s think pac ducked him when history shows floyd avoids serious fighters. you got to be an idiot or a complete nut hugging fa--ot not to see floyd is the one who ducked pacquaio

 

It's official. Hagler's a *******. No seriously, I've always thought that when a boxer is cherrypicking that a loss is looming on the horizon regardless for whatever reason they feel it necessary for cherrypicking in the first place. I have faith everything will work out like it's supposed to. :rasta

 

I agree he should fight guys coming off of losses, career lows, and poor performances like Pacquiao. :rofl

 

:deal hilarious

 

man, i used to be a *****, true story back in the old days. but it got so bad with him with his ducking ways that i felt like a fool trying to defend him against *******s. from then on, i couldnt defend floyd any more. its like living a lie man. i cant do it

 

Chill man, Most Boxing fans or that follows boxing sees Manny Pacquiao as a warrior and will be rated higher than Mayweather because of his accomplishments in the ring as being a ''LITTLE Filipino''

Undefeated is not everything.

 

Getting brutally KOed by Marquez, looking average in going the distance with a blown up lightweight coming off a loss dont earn you a shot i against Floyd

 

floyd would beat hagler at 154

 

:blood

 

And..... what happens when Pac becomes the WBO 147 champion again coming in the next few weeks? :deal

Will Mayweather fight him then or not?

 

and i guess guerrero and maidana deserve a shot okay:roll:

 

I just realised something, Mayweather fought 2 past their prime fighters @ the full 154 pounds against Cotto & De La Hoya and Mayweather fought a ''young, hungry & drained lion'' in Alvarez @ 152 :deal

 

:deal

Mayweather knows when to fight ''champions''

 

I love both fighters, but who has more motivation to not to take a risky fight? Pacquiao who has loses and who's attractiveness doesn't hinge on a 0, or Mayweather who has no loses and who's attractiveness depends, to a large degree, on that 0? That's how I cut through all the "who said what and when." I look at motive--it's always the core of a matter. Who has a larger motive for the fight not to happen? It's always been Mayweather, IMO.