who do you think robbed pacquiao in the bradley fight ?

so its pretty much globally accepted pac won that fight (on my cards by only 2 rounds but 2 very clear rounds).

but who was responsible for him being robbed ?

pac was the bigger star by a long shot, normally its expected to see the star attraction get a gift but this was the exact opposite


my theory : bob arum is responsible, he is one of VERY FEW people with enough power to order such a high class robbery and he did it because pacs contract with TR ran out and he did not immediately resign, bob arum feared his number 1 cash cow was about to go his own way like bob arums other cash cows had done in the past (see : floyd mayweather and oscar delahoya).

 

Arum or some people paid off Duane ford and cj Ross because they had a big bet on Bradley to win .

I'm positive it was corruption not incompetence because Duane ford is known to be shady and scored close Taylor - Hopkins rounds for Taylor as we was the aggressor yet his explanation for Bradley pacquaio scoring went against that. Cj Ross is shady as Fk.

 

eeerm the judges maybe ?

 

do you honestly think any person could find a way to score that fight for bradley... let alone a trained professional, surely there was an outside influence..

legitimately you cant find a handful of people who thought bradley won that fight yet you mean to tell me out of that minuscule minority 2 of those people landed in the judges chairs ? i dont buy that for a second

 

i dont remember the odds being to incredibly in favour of pac... surely could have found an easier fight with more stacked odds and less high profile to rig ?

 

no one cares for the result everyone knows bradley lost even all the mayweathers and that is saying something :deal

 

*****s still think he lost

 

even the mayweathers said Bradley lost

 

Himself for being a diva making EVERYONE wait while he watched basketball. Judges were pissed for not showing professionalism.

 

no they dont. apart from the obvious trolls

 

Some of the most shadiest decisions were with arum fighters. No surprise there. Marquez loses questionable decisions to Pacquaio then Pacquaio to Bradley, tho in slo no you will see Bradley outland Pacquaio. Delahoya-Trinidad, Abril-Rios, list goes on.

 

Arum.

Heard Pac hasnt signed his extension so im hoping he wins, if he looks good we could finally get a Floyd vs Pac fight, 6 years later

 

I think may not have been malicious intentions, just weird ass judging.

You can think it's corruption, but why would corruption work in Bradley's favour? There were all these conspiracy theories about the decision in Pac/JMM3… Pacquiao supposedly winning because the contrary would lead perturbing a fight with Mayweather. Then why the hell was THIS fight, one which Pacquiao clearly won, scored to his detriment against a guy who isn't a financial draw at all.

There are 1000s of decisions in boxing, and a few of them are bound to miss the mark by a considerable margin. There are always outliers in human judgment, and this was one of them.

 

Spot on!

 

Two ******ed judges.