Probably. He's clearly on Floyd's level, considering how easily he dispatched Manny last time. Bradley and FMJ are A fighters. Pac is a B- at best.
A small WW who didn't have any power at JWW isn't going to beat FLoyd. A guy who has probably half the technical ability of Floyd isn't going to "school" him either. Bradley does nothing in the ring better than FLoyd. Maybe he has slightly better footspeed (just because Floyd is in his late 30's now,) but he doesn't utilize his footwork as efficiently as FLoyd does. He's also shorter than Floyd and has a smaller reach. So essentially Bradley's only shot is to come inside on FLoyd, which is a very bad idea for Timmy considering FLoyd is a great inside fighter and is deceptively strong in the clenches. Also, FLoyd will probably counter him to death every time Bradley tries to make his move on the inside. FLoyd is all wrong for Bradley's style. And lastly, Timmy is able to get hit very easily throughout a fight. Can't say that about arguably a Top 3-5 defensive fighter in the history of the sport. I think FLoyd "easily" beats Bradley, no question in my mind. Bradley has very little chance in that kind of fight, FLoyd's countershots will stun him all across the ring.
So that's your rebuttal to what I posted? COme on man, I know you're an idiot, but at least I thought you'd attempt to make some form of debate as to why Bradley would beat FLoyd? Going life and death with a slow, flat footed Ruslan doesn't make Bradley tough, it makes him stupid. He could've easily avoided half that onslaught if he actually utilized the entire ring instead of trading in the pocket with a guy who had no chance if he just boxed him. Once again, there's 3 ways to fight any fighter, you either stand in the middle of the ring and try to fight them/outbox them, you try to get inside and rough them up on the inside, or you try to do a combination of the 2. Timmy is much smaller than FLoyd is, and there's a very large reach advantage for Floyd also. COmbine those 2 physical traits with the fact that Mayweather is just a better "pure" and technical boxer than Bradley, than it's easy to envision FLoyd picking Bradley apart if Bradley decides to fight from a distance. Now if Bradley decides to go for broke and attempt to get inside the pocket and rough up FLoyd, he'll have to get through Floyd's superlative counterpunching and lead shots, which is easier said than done. In any case, if Bradley ACTUALLY is able to get inside, he'll realize very quickly that Floyd is the much stronger fighter of the 2 inside the pocket. He's not going to push around Mayweather on the inside, FLoyd will definitely rough him up in there. I can't imagine how Bradley would have any chance against Floyd. It's not like he's packing bricks in his hands either, so the idea of him getting lucky with one shot is moot. His 2 options are either: get picked apart by FLoyd from the outside or get roughed up by FLoyd in the inside. I don't doubt Timmy is a tough SOB, but from a stylistic point of view, this is as bad of a matchup as you could make for Bradley-- to take on a bigger guy than him who's also a better boxer, better defender and has more power than him. FLoyd would beat the brakes off of Timmy.
Plus he is much more agile than Mayweather at this point. Bradley is an easy fight for no one at 147 and that includes Floyd.
no one in this era has the same amount of accolades and achievements as pacquaio those are the facts *****
^^Ok you're entitled to your opinion. But instead of making a baseless comment, why don't you provide some actual details as to why Bradley is a better fighter than FLoyd? Because he stood in the pocket like an idiot with RUslan? Come on, provide me with some reasoning as to why Bradley is better than Floyd. I'd love to hear what Bradley does in specific that's better than Floyd inside the boxing ring. This should be interesting.
pacquaio is faster and hits harder then mayweather he can box really well if he wants he punches from weird angles with POWER if duckweather had issues with Judah and Ortiz imagine pacquaio their is list of things pacquaio does better
Are you that much of a crazy person? All my posts were about Floyd vs Bradley. Where did I even mention pacman???
As far as Floyd vs Pacman, I could easily explain to you why Floyd would beat Pacman in the ring. But I don't want to get sidetracked, all my posts were about Bradley vs Floyd. You said Bradley is the better fighter and than somehow segued that statement with speaking about Manny which is one of the more ridiculous things I've see you post in sometime. Explain to me how BRADLEY is a better fighter than FLOYD. Stick to the topic at hand boxing_master.