The "All Things Mayweather/Pacquiao" Express!!!!!!

GTFOH YOU STUPID GAY BOY MARQUEZ FOUGHT BOTH OF THEM HE SAID PACQUAIO HITS HARDER AND IS FASTER THEN DUCKWEATHER

AND SHANE SAID THE SAME

[url]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rnNHYAFdBLA[/url]
GO TO 0.20 SECOND GAY BOY:deal

 

[url]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b3YZsqCoVPg[/url]

Shane doesn't say anything lol he just says manny has decent punching power ? :S

 

lol















lol





















lol


















:hi:

 

This right here proves that YDKSAB...

 

Your lying, I believe he said Vernon Forrest was the hardest pincer he faced

Btw Vernon proved it

 

what's wrong about it?

 

His most recent win was against Rios, who never fought at 147, and was coming off a loss himself.

He got beat on by Marquez, and beat on by Bradley, and before that he got a gift decision vs Marquez in their third fight.

Realistically he should be around 11th or 12th. In back of Danny Garcia (who cleaned out 140), Canelo Alvarez (Loss to Money) but beat Trout when his stock was high, and beat on Angulo too.

They aren't better fighters than him, but their recent resumes are better. Pacquiao should be removed from any P4P list until he earns it.

Floyd, Rigo, Bradley, Ward, Martinez, Garcia, Canelo, Wlad, JMM and Froch all have better recent resumes than Pacquiao. Its an insult to fighters who go out there and win for Pacquiao to be up on the list.

If he is there. Cotto should be there too, since they both were coming off losses and took on D fighters for tuneups.

He hasn't looked good since the Mosley fight. How long are you going to reward someone for looking like ****?



[url]https://dviw3bl0enbyw.cloudfront.net/uploads/forum_attachment/file/65745/DisGonBGud.gif[/url]

 

You're fast to show your bias, boxrec warrior.

Now fk off. :smoke

 

Either way you put it, he lost. He didn't look impressive, he looked like ****. How long are you going to reward a guy for looking like ****?

 

Who looked great against Tim Bradley, who is a top level operator?

You said he got BEAT ON, by Bradley. I think the world saw a totally different fight.

 

If you're an A fighter. You should look good always. You should look good in a losing effort. It's one thing to lose, and it's another thing to look bad while losing.

People are keeping Pac there because of his name. His recent resume does not justify it. These are the facts.

 

The theory goes that a fighter is SUPPOSED to lose to someone higher ranked P4P. Otherwise he shouldn't be ranked lower than the fighter he beat. So, taking whether or not we agree with the decisions out of the equation, Pacquiao lost to two fighters who are now more highly ranked P4P. That doesn't mean he shouldn't be on the P4P list, it just means he should be below Bradley and Marquez. And he is

Aside from Floyd, Ward and Rigondeaux, most of the P4P fighters have had a rough go of it lately.

If he loses to someone who is not on the P4P list, THEN we should take him off.

 

You mention Froch but he's looked **** in numerous fights including his last fight. Froch has looked **** against worse competition than Manny's competition.

Which Garcia are you talking about because if it's Danny, he also didn't look good in his last fight which was a against guy who isn't as good as the guys Pac looked bad against.

Martinez also hasn't looked great in some recent fights.

JMM also looked **** against Bradley and Floyd.

Alvarez also looked **** in a recent fight against Floyd.

 

modern stop being the corner man for ducky and Ellerbe

 

Come on now. Cotto gave Floyd fits? He got taken to school.
And Mosley nearly killed Floyd? He landed two good shots then got thoroughly outboxed, outsmarted, shutout for the remainder of the fight.

I agree about the *****s, but please