The "All Things Mayweather/Pacquiao" Express!!!!!!

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by IntentionalButt, May 30, 2008.


Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. YCGS

    YCGS Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,067
    1,271
    Sep 13, 2013
    No. Not even if he viciously ko's Timmy.
     
  2. I Know Everythi

    I Know Everythi Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,100
    25
    Feb 12, 2014
    prime for prime and career-wise of today's boxers the best is Roy Jones followed by Bernard Hopkins
     
  3. I Know Everythi

    I Know Everythi Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,100
    25
    Feb 12, 2014
    Much more deserving of it than either of the Klitschkos
     
  4. nicamarvin

    nicamarvin Guest

    ******.. :nono
     
  5. nicamarvin

    nicamarvin Guest

    you dont know **** about boxing.. :nono
     
  6. M.3

    M.3 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,196
    355
    Mar 21, 2014
    Only in a perfect world.. Y'all still complain about a 37 year old man not fighting the best prime fighters in or around his weight class.. They said a 23 year old Alvarez was too young and weight drained by 2 pounds (one pound if you count that he was 153 the fight before).. I can't imagine what the masses would say if he loses.. You would never hear the end if it...
     
  7. Nay_Sayer

    Nay_Sayer On Rick James Status banned Full Member

    15,707
    503
    May 25, 2009
    YOU are the *******, Genius...
     
  8. modernfonzie

    modernfonzie Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,595
    8
    Aug 25, 2013
    I was 7. And absolutely. boxing isn't complicated. not for viewers, more for the fighters.

    My little brother started watching football last year, and he can tell me every position. Knows what each is for, gametimes, and started cursing at the TV when Peyton stunk it up :lol:

    "Wow Peyton. You don't deserve that money you're getting. And to think people say he's better than Brady"

    He's 8.
     
  9. Manfred

    Manfred Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,187
    5,402
    May 22, 2011
    :lol::lol: That NiccaMarvin is on a roll. Yall can't hold him today.:yep
     
  10. Pimp C

    Pimp C Too Much Motion Full Member

    122,871
    34,859
    Jun 23, 2005
    I have him around 8 or 9 on my list.
     
  11. Rage of Wodan

    Rage of Wodan Active Member Full Member

    894
    1
    Feb 14, 2014
    whats with this obsession around here of telling people they "dont know **** about boxing"?
     
  12. progamer

    progamer Boxing Junkie banned

    10,232
    0
    Nov 25, 2013
    is this even news?

    pedjr's biggest win was trex corrales.

    enough said.

    pac = 8 div champ, fotd
    = generational talent.

    pedjr = 15yrs of boxing, bronze. fail.
    = good salesman, **** resume.
     
  13. nicamarvin

    nicamarvin Guest

    cause they Dont...:huh
     
  14. demigawd

    demigawd Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,046
    154
    May 1, 2006
    I double-checked the Ring P4P list. Floyd, Ward and Bradley as #1-3 are pretty rock solid. You can't really debate those three much. If you subscribe to the philosophy that the P4P list should be a rolling list that takes a snapshot of the last two years, I can understand an argument having Bradley even higher. Whether you agree with the decisions or not, beating two P4P'ers in three fights is probably the best accomplishment over the last two years of any boxer on this list.

    I can also see Rigo being ranked as high as #4 just based on his comprehensive defeat of Donaire. It's probably the single best performance of all the fighters on this list. But I also won't object to people wanting to see him against a wider variety of top fighters first.

    I can see Marquez as high as #4 and as low as #6, which is sandwiched between Bradley and Pacquiao. I am not against Wlad being in that general mix as well because he's been so dominant, even if his competition isn't that great. I think you can make the P4P list by either having a spectacular win (Rigondeaux) or having a string of absolute dominant wins (Wlad).

    Sergio I'm torn over. He did not look like a P4P fighter in his last fight, and I think the only reason he remained on the list is because of his nice reserve of solid wins prior to that. But if you're of the "rolling two year" philosophy, he has the biggest case against him remaining on the P4P list. This goes beyond Murray - for the past few fights Sergio has looked very vulnerable and won on sheer grit.

    I would put Pacquiao ahead of Sergio. Scoring aside, he looked dominant against Bradley, and he was performing well against Marquez. Sure he lost them both, but they're higher caliber fighters than, say, Murray or Chavez.

    Rigo is an interesting case. Going by pure eye test and his performance against Donaire, he LOOKS every bit as skilled as Mayweather and Ward, and based on the eye test, should be ranked as high as #4. But I can understand Ring's #8 ranking, to account for the possibility that he just benefited from a favourable stylistic match-up and an under-prepared Donaire.

    Alvarez was understandably wiped out by Mayweather, which was supposed to happen. But I question why he's on the P4P list at all. His best win was Trout, who was never on the P4P list himself. And Froch's performance against Groves also raises serious question marks. I'd actually put Garcia higher than either. Garcia's last opponent is better than Groves.

    I'd put Pacquiao anywhere between 6-8, but DEFINITELY still in the top 10.
     
  15. demigawd

    demigawd Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,046
    154
    May 1, 2006
    For me:

    1. Floyd
    2. Ward
    3. Bradley
    4. Rigondeaux
    5. Marquez
    6. Wlad
    7. Pacquiao
    8. Sergio
    9. Danny Garcia
    10. GGG

    Honorable mentions: Mikey Garcia, Adonis Stevenson, Nonito Donaire. I wouldn't object to any of these guys being interchanged with any of the guys from 8-10.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.