how is 3GGG that much better than Kelly Pavlik?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by RafaelGonzal, Mar 25, 2014.

Page 6 of 11
  1. bailey

    bailey Loyal Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2009
    Messages:
    40,311
    Likes Received:
    3,422
    Kelly had a good chin
     
    bailey, Mar 25, 2014
    #76
  2. Muff

    Muff Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2013
    Messages:
    1,936
    Likes Received:
    1
    Would've been a good fight just to watch the jab contest alone.
     
    Muff, Mar 25, 2014
    #77
  3. Pimp C

    Pimp C Too Much Motion

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2005
    Messages:
    124,205
    Likes Received:
    36,435
    I just wish Kelly was still around. 160 would be a great division if he was.
     
    Pimp C, Mar 25, 2014
    #78
  4. Ol' Bub

    Ol' Bub Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2012
    Messages:
    10,213
    Likes Received:
    758
    You mean 168?
     
    Ol' Bub, Mar 25, 2014
    #79
  5. Kevin Willis

    Kevin Willis Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2013
    Messages:
    9,692
    Likes Received:
    11,867
    Most of these new born Pavlik fans hated the guy when he fought. Picked him to get smashed by Miranda. Cried fluke when he stopped Taylor and rejoiced when he lost to Hopkins.

    Now when confronted with a terror from the East like Golovkin, suddenly Pavlik is their guy and would have spared their fragile sensibilities the indignity of GGG tearing through the division(s).
     
    Kevin Willis, Mar 25, 2014
    #80
    Eksman likes this.
  6. The Mongoose

    The Mongoose I honor my bets banned

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2009
    Messages:
    24,478
    Likes Received:
    128
    Exactly. Pavlik was getting so much **** on forums like this, about as much as Golovkin. Now he represents better days.

    **** off, the lot of you.
     
    The Mongoose, Mar 25, 2014
    #81
  7. Xelloss

    Xelloss Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2013
    Messages:
    7,854
    Likes Received:
    8
    Such is the cycle of boxing.

    For me, Pavliks the hometown guy just like Porter. Not many world class boxers from Midwest states, so when local-ish guys do make it big its hard not to be a fan.

    Unless they are total embarrassments like Broner.
     
    Xelloss, Mar 25, 2014
    #82
  8. SweetSciGuru

    SweetSciGuru Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2014
    Messages:
    9,132
    Likes Received:
    5
    stop whining and wasting space.
    say something real or STFU! :yep
     
    SweetSciGuru, Mar 25, 2014
    #83
  9. drozzy

    drozzy AERE Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2010
    Messages:
    12,271
    Likes Received:
    29
    Semantics. You call world title holders prospects then? Dumbass. :lol:

    Who gives a ****? Everybody but you. Sergio's promoter acknowledged the fact that Sergio's successor has already been identified but not yet been crowned, and that's Golovkin. Tube it.

    How would he be a "paper champ" for getting Sergio's belt? So, when a lineal champ retires, everybody becomes a paper champ? I guess Kessler was a paper champ when Calzaghe retired, which makes Ward a paper champ himself. Nice.

    :rofl

    Stevenson is 5'11" and fights at LHW... oh you mean former SMW 5'7" Stevens? Crack is bad for you. :conf
     
    drozzy, Mar 25, 2014
    #84
  10. Kevin Willis

    Kevin Willis Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2013
    Messages:
    9,692
    Likes Received:
    11,867

    Choke on blood, bluegums!
     
    Kevin Willis, Mar 25, 2014
    #85
    Eksman likes this.
  11. Nay_Sayer

    Nay_Sayer On Rick James Status banned Full Member

    Joined:
    May 25, 2009
    Messages:
    15,707
    Likes Received:
    503
    Semantics?

    LOL.

    Do yourself a favor and stop smoking the crack.


    I can hear violins playing.
     
    Nay_Sayer, Mar 25, 2014
    #86
  12. drozzy

    drozzy AERE Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2010
    Messages:
    12,271
    Likes Received:
    29
    You've got nothing, you didn't even try to argue my points. Have fun trolling. :lol:
     
    drozzy, Mar 25, 2014
    #87
  13. Farmboxer

    Farmboxer VIP Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2004
    Messages:
    86,106
    Likes Received:
    4,098
    Golovkin would have outboxed Pavlik. The skill level was way too much for Pavlik..............
     
    Farmboxer, Mar 25, 2014
    #88
  14. cuchulain

    cuchulain Loyal Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2007
    Messages:
    38,446
    Likes Received:
    13,287
    Bollocks, lad.

    In terms of wins, Kelly has Taylor, who at the time was superior to any name GGG has.

    But that's it.



    In terms of loses, Kelly has an ancient BHop and a small Sergio.


    Pavlik would probably have lost to Chavez junior at 168, so GGG-Chavez will be a decent meter for GGG.
     
    cuchulain, Mar 25, 2014
    #89
  15. SweetSciGuru

    SweetSciGuru Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2014
    Messages:
    9,132
    Likes Received:
    5
    LOL :rofl:rofl:rofl

    I think you have unintentionally help him make his point.
    It's amazing that you fail to realize it.

    As you said, Kelly has Taylor, Hopkins, and Sergio on his resume.
    GGG has faced nobody of the caliber of either of those fighters. Therefore, he is correct. Pavlik's resume is > GGG's. :yep
     
    SweetSciGuru, Mar 25, 2014
    #90
Page 6 of 11