how is 3GGG that much better than Kelly Pavlik?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by RafaelGonzal, Mar 25, 2014.


  1. bailey

    bailey Loyal Member Full Member

    40,311
    3,421
    Dec 11, 2009
    Kelly had a good chin
     
  2. Muff

    Muff Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,936
    1
    Mar 29, 2013
    Would've been a good fight just to watch the jab contest alone.
     
  3. Pimp C

    Pimp C Too Much Motion

    124,205
    36,435
    Jun 23, 2005
    I just wish Kelly was still around. 160 would be a great division if he was.
     
  4. Ol' Bub

    Ol' Bub Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,213
    758
    Feb 28, 2012
    You mean 168?
     
  5. Kevin Willis

    Kevin Willis Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    9,692
    11,867
    Jan 16, 2013
    Most of these new born Pavlik fans hated the guy when he fought. Picked him to get smashed by Miranda. Cried fluke when he stopped Taylor and rejoiced when he lost to Hopkins.

    Now when confronted with a terror from the East like Golovkin, suddenly Pavlik is their guy and would have spared their fragile sensibilities the indignity of GGG tearing through the division(s).
     
    Eksman likes this.
  6. The Mongoose

    The Mongoose I honor my bets banned

    24,478
    128
    Aug 13, 2009
    Exactly. Pavlik was getting so much **** on forums like this, about as much as Golovkin. Now he represents better days.

    **** off, the lot of you.
     
  7. Xelloss

    Xelloss Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,854
    8
    Oct 23, 2013
    Such is the cycle of boxing.

    For me, Pavliks the hometown guy just like Porter. Not many world class boxers from Midwest states, so when local-ish guys do make it big its hard not to be a fan.

    Unless they are total embarrassments like Broner.
     
  8. SweetSciGuru

    SweetSciGuru Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,132
    5
    Feb 23, 2014
    stop whining and wasting space.
    say something real or STFU! :yep
     
  9. drozzy

    drozzy AERE Full Member

    12,271
    29
    Nov 2, 2010
    Semantics. You call world title holders prospects then? Dumbass. :lol:

    Who gives a ****? Everybody but you. Sergio's promoter acknowledged the fact that Sergio's successor has already been identified but not yet been crowned, and that's Golovkin. Tube it.

    How would he be a "paper champ" for getting Sergio's belt? So, when a lineal champ retires, everybody becomes a paper champ? I guess Kessler was a paper champ when Calzaghe retired, which makes Ward a paper champ himself. Nice.

    :rofl

    Stevenson is 5'11" and fights at LHW... oh you mean former SMW 5'7" Stevens? Crack is bad for you. :conf
     
  10. Kevin Willis

    Kevin Willis Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    9,692
    11,867
    Jan 16, 2013

    Choke on blood, bluegums!
     
    Eksman likes this.
  11. Nay_Sayer

    Nay_Sayer On Rick James Status banned Full Member

    15,707
    503
    May 25, 2009
    Semantics?

    LOL.

    Do yourself a favor and stop smoking the crack.


    I can hear violins playing.
     
  12. drozzy

    drozzy AERE Full Member

    12,271
    29
    Nov 2, 2010
    You've got nothing, you didn't even try to argue my points. Have fun trolling. :lol:
     
  13. Farmboxer

    Farmboxer VIP Member Full Member

    86,106
    4,098
    Jul 19, 2004
    Golovkin would have outboxed Pavlik. The skill level was way too much for Pavlik..............
     
  14. cuchulain

    cuchulain Loyal Member Full Member

    38,444
    13,287
    Jan 6, 2007
    Bollocks, lad.

    In terms of wins, Kelly has Taylor, who at the time was superior to any name GGG has.

    But that's it.



    In terms of loses, Kelly has an ancient BHop and a small Sergio.


    Pavlik would probably have lost to Chavez junior at 168, so GGG-Chavez will be a decent meter for GGG.
     
  15. SweetSciGuru

    SweetSciGuru Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,132
    5
    Feb 23, 2014
    LOL :rofl:rofl:rofl

    I think you have unintentionally help him make his point.
    It's amazing that you fail to realize it.

    As you said, Kelly has Taylor, Hopkins, and Sergio on his resume.
    GGG has faced nobody of the caliber of either of those fighters. Therefore, he is correct. Pavlik's resume is > GGG's. :yep