how is 3GGG that much better than Kelly Pavlik?

Simple, everyone that was relevant at 160 when Kelly was king
fought him. Everyone that is relevant at 160 while GGG is king
ducks him.

 

Newsflash, Sweeetie.

Kelly lost every round of the Hopkins fight and his face looked like a used panty-liner after Sergio.

Those events don't go in the positive column.

Talk to a friend about this.

One who can think.

 

The point is, if GGG fought at that level perhaps his face would be worked over, or he could lose every round also.
But, we don't know simply becayse as of today, GGG has never fought at that level.
Ya Dig? :yep

 

Since when does getting owned by someone count in the plus column? Here's a tip: Getting your ass kicked by someone doesn't put them on your resume as a boon to your success. Think. If Pavlik had a good showing against those guys, maybe, but he was abysmal. You guys are really trying to stretch things here.

 

No.

When evaluating resume, wins count in your FAVOUR. Losses count AGAINST you.

Some losses can help you out a bit if you were a serious underdog and did well.

This doesn't apply in Kelly's case as he was the favourite in both the losses I mentioned and got mauled in both.


What MIGHT have happened to GGG is called hypothetical, as in guess.

And when we have REAL results to work with in both men's cases, we don't need to guess.


As I mentioned, talk to an adult about this stuff.

It's called THINKING.


You can get this stuff if you keep tryin'

(an' cut back a bit on the LOLing)

 

Win or lose, Pavlik fought at a higher level than GGG has ever since. Fact!

 

See above, then think about it. :yep

 

Naw, you still need a bit of one-on-one on this, lad, with a thinker.

Maybe a diagram would help.




I'll give it one last try.


I could fight Floyd and Pac and Canelo and Lara and JMM and get my ass kicked by all five.

Now see, that wouldn't put me at or above Khan, who hasn't fought any of these guys.


Ya dig ?

 

All of your delusional Pro-GGG arguments are simply repackaged Bute arguments.
Before Froch, Lucien Bute fans made all the exact same arguments of how Bute would beat Froch, Ward, Hopkins, kessler and everyone else put in front of him.
How everyone wass ducking him. How he was locked out of the Super6. blah..blah..blah, whine, whine, whine..LOL
The fools made their argument when Bute hadn't fought any body worth mentioning, just like GGG.
Think about it. :rofl:rofl:yep

 

Froch ?

Bute ?

It appears you've sat on the remote and changed the channel.

You've completely lost the plot.

:hi:

 

Same Ho
New Dress :yep

 

All these posters who nuthug Black fighters ***** and moan when whitey beats them like Pavlik beating Taylor but when Whitey loses like Pavlik to Hopkins, they suddenly become less threatening to the Afrosupremacists. So they inevitably use them as proxy's to discredit other fighters that threaten their world view like GGG and Kovalev.

For instance: If GGG would lose to Ward, they would find him non threatening and eventually support him when the next one comes along that scares them so much.

 

Same I.Q., still South of room temperature.