Regardless of how the official result looked, everyone who watched that fight realised it was the beginning of the end for Burns. He was second best all night and it was clear that his movement is utterly awful and he's a sitting duck for a slick, quick boxer and Crawford proved that beyond all doubt.
The gesture was in response to a shocking remark made by Crawfords coach for which he apologised shortly after. I think you'll find most people appriciate my comment because I actually know what I'm talking about being involed, unlike your sado self who makes comments on people when you simply couldn't. Lace there shoes pal, your a wannabe who simply cannot be!!! AND YOUR STILL A WANKER. BE A MAN AND POST UNDER YOUR REAL NAME SO I CAN FIND YOU
I told you, drop down to SMW you fat **** and I'll happily stand in front of you. :good Don't you have some arses to wipe or whatever it is you do for your second job? Not even a full-time trainer. atsch
What I seems and everyone else was yes Ricky got outboxed for 6 round, dug in came out strong and broke Jose's heart. Oh yes and Ricky getting his hand raised as the WINNER! GET IT UP YE SADO!!!!
Crolla isn't in Burns league at the moment, Burns would school him imo, Burns needs to move up to 140.
You come visit me anytime son I promise you a bigger beating than any of your daddy's and uncles that visit have ever give you! :rofl
You say Gonzalez only quit through due to injury, yet you fail to mention that Burns had a broken jaw for the majority of his fight vs Beltran which ofcourse is going to affect how a fight turns out. Your trying to say if Gonzalez wasn't 'injured' he would of won, then the same can apply for Burns vs Beltran. Personally, I think he was poor in the Gonzalez fight but produced a great uppercut after Gonzalez onslaught that took nearly everything out of him, unlucky to get injured badly in the next fight and then lost to a class fighter in his last fight who he was expected to lose to anyway. So I don't see why his results are seen so bad when you take everything into account? The only reason he was getting so much grieve was due to the beltran performance after the Gonzalez fight. But let's be realistic, anyone with a broken jaw fighting for that long in a fight is going to struggle immensely and seriously affect how they can perform. Before you begin with the 'he got a broken jaw because his defence was ****', boxers often get hit cleanly, how many of them end up with broken jaws, not many, it's a rare occurence and it unfortunately happened on the back of a overall poor performance in his previous fight.
Solaris read a respectful poster who speaks about facts not what rumbles about in his tiny head. Great post
Billy we were talking Rugby man ha Anyway, selections are London +24 or 26 depending on which bookies are local to you. Saints +6 is the bet of the weekend. +8 with Coral.........unless the bookies know about an inury we don't because +8 seems too good to be true.
I can understand that after the last fight,but in the unlikely event of him beating Vasquez there would be a bit of pressure on him at some point to defend against Ricky. He would probably be able to keep avoiding him because he would probably,deservedly ,make a very easy voluntary and then lose to his mandatory.
Not a fact though is it. Conspiracy theory nonsense What i was trying to say was Burns has absolutley no relevance to the potential Mitchell-Vasquez fight. Anyway, as it happens that fight isn't happening... Mitchell to fight a Canadian in an eliminator- Vasquez won't be ready for 31 because of a cut