Sturm will rematch....

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Kissan, Mar 31, 2014.


  1. Sugar 88

    Sugar 88 Woke Moralist-In-Chief

    27,259
    18,342
    Feb 4, 2012
    Yawn. You think prime De La Hoya was at middleweight? You sir have just proved that you don't know jack about boxing.
     
  2. like a boss

    like a boss Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,608
    8,900
    Jul 30, 2012
    Sounds like you need to get a grip of yourself and accept Sturm didn't win any of those 3 fights :yep
     
  3. boxeo#1

    boxeo#1 Boxer-Puncher banned

    8,993
    1
    May 11, 2007
    Who on earth would like to see this? :patsch
     
  4. boxeo#1

    boxeo#1 Boxer-Puncher banned

    8,993
    1
    May 11, 2007
    :lol:
    Good one.
     
  5. The Devil

    The Devil Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,418
    138
    Jan 31, 2014
  6. boxeo#1

    boxeo#1 Boxer-Puncher banned

    8,993
    1
    May 11, 2007
    Actually, it's Adnan Catic. :lol:
     
  7. lencoreastside

    lencoreastside Obsessed with Boxing banned Full Member

    20,213
    5,012
    Dec 27, 2010
    Nice one. Its always great to see another Sturm fan. :good
     
  8. lencoreastside

    lencoreastside Obsessed with Boxing banned Full Member

    20,213
    5,012
    Dec 27, 2010
    He lost money big-time on the Barker "fight".
    Essentially he bought Barkers title - to replace the one he was wrongfully deprived of against Flapper Geale.
    Felix was counting on the Barker rematch to recoup some of that.

    Bad form that, from Barker. Fooled an awful lot of people though.
    Remember all that "hard man" act at the weight in, pushing into Sturms face? Getting his travelling fans all worked up at the weigh-in - and for what?
    For a million of Sturms euros ,thats what! Splash!
    Barker got off very lightly for that little farce. Anybody else would have been crucified - but Baffling Barren Ducker was/is the darling of the London media, Sky Sports etc and can do no wrong in the eyes of his adoring London-English fans.
     
  9. Tim Tam

    Tim Tam Guest

    sturm will lose to soliman again .
     
  10. Sugar 88

    Sugar 88 Woke Moralist-In-Chief

    27,259
    18,342
    Feb 4, 2012
    He was clearly injured and conned his fans for a cash out payday. This much is clear. Whether or not he'd have a chance of beating sturm had he been healthy is naturally a source of debate.

    Is this worse than Felix conning his fans into buying into joke fights like this? You say he has unfinished business with Solimann but why did he even fight him the first time?
     
  11. Tim Tam

    Tim Tam Guest

    sturm lost to geale and wasn't soliman ranked number 1 ? maybe thats why they fought the first time .
     
  12. boxeo#1

    boxeo#1 Boxer-Puncher banned

    8,993
    1
    May 11, 2007
  13. lencoreastside

    lencoreastside Obsessed with Boxing banned Full Member

    20,213
    5,012
    Dec 27, 2010
    Sugar - credit is due to you for not shirking from this Barker issue. Fair play. :thumbsup
    Synephrine Sam was a highly-ranked contender for Sturms title - and you surely wouldnt call him a soft touch. He is a stylistic nightmare for anyone. No-one else wants to fight him, he is very hard to deal with.
     
  14. Sugar 88

    Sugar 88 Woke Moralist-In-Chief

    27,259
    18,342
    Feb 4, 2012
    Well the Barker fight was an obvious farce. There are no pensions in boxing and those people who supported him wouldn't care if he was broke in a dead end job in a few years time so I see exactly why he did what he did. Does that make it right? No. Might I do the same in his position? Maybe.

    Then, my questions is if Soliman got a shot based upon ranking why was his number one contender/mandatory so painstakingly avoided for so long? As usual Felix sought out the worst opponent he thought he could get away with no?
     
  15. lencoreastside

    lencoreastside Obsessed with Boxing banned Full Member

    20,213
    5,012
    Dec 27, 2010