Nobody really gives a fcuk about undercards tbh they pay there money based on the main event , only hardcore fans go early watch the undercard the rest stay in the bar and get smashed some barely even seein the top of bill
No I disagree A quality undercard is necessary especially an event of this magnitude with it being full capacity at Wembley and on PPV.
Look at his record got some good stoppages. Also counter in coyle was put over 4 times by a non punching super feather. I don't think this fight will happen I think hearn building coyle up for campbell and a big fight in hull.
i dont see any stoppage of great quality on his record tbh howevee more to the point hes been stopped when went up in class of opponent
Your saying coyle is in the class of burns and the aussie lad kasides. Mitchell stopped John murray and the lad from leeds carl johanssen both very tough fighters. Coyle stepped up outboxed matthews and got sparked then fought against super feathers/ feathers. Mitchell is a full blown lightweight who can box and lands hurtful shots.
True the last opponent was shocking and since burns defeat its been about getting rounds and keeping him active but mitchell has fought a better level. wats coyle done then beat a feather in simpson and journeymen. He did box well against matthews but still got ko'd.
Believe it or not mate, there are people who expect Brook v Khan or other worthy PPV fights to be on the undercard, makes me cringe when I hear it. Vasquez won't be ready for May 31 apparently and Hall is contracted to boxnation so I'm not sure if we will get another world title on the card- honestly don't think there needs to be either, just my opinion
60k tickets sold with no undercard announcement so they'd be fine barring it turning out like the hall/ward fight, but there's a massive opportunity for them to use this as a platform to make one of their other fighters a massive star Now fury v chisora, that's a fight that needs a good undercard to sell into triple figures...