Pacquiao is a fool for even putting himself in a position to get robbed. I only gave Bradley the rounds where Pac did nothing, still ended up with a 7-5 Pac win but c'mon, he deserved to get robbed.
Pacquiao won every round, the only way you have this for Bradley is if you dont know how to score a fight or you are biased towards a certain race. By far one of the biggest if not the biggest robberies of all time.
How did you score the pacquiao vs marquez 3 fight seeing that you are neither biased nor inept at scoring ?
Exactly. There are easily enough rounds to give to Bradley that keep the fight reasonably close without having him winning. Give Bradley less than 3 rounds and ur an idiot/biased ass. Give him more than 5, and ur an idiot/biased ass. The thing that really gets me are the people that gave Pac 10 or 11 rounds are the ones saying the rematch is gonna be close and competitive... Interesting how that happened
Sorry but yeah, kind of. Which of the following rounds did you not give Bradley? 1, 8, 10, 11, 12. Those were all Bradley rounds. The 7th was Pac's on my card but razor-thin. (and that is Jim Lampley's so-called "smoking gun"...which he aired on The Fight Game w/o commentary to prove that Pacquiao was dominating, only to have it show what a close session it actually was...)
I scored it 8-4 for Pacquiao and Pacquiao Marquez III 7-5 for JMM. I defend these scores on the basis that this very same poll would be closer if it applied to the third Marquez fight.
Yeah I'll take it from this alt. Check out the number of biased idiots scoring it 10-2, including Danny Garcia and Jeff May weather http://boxrec.com/media/index.php/Manny_Pacquiao_vs._Timothy_Bradley
that's pathetic. The most controversial of the 3 was near 50/50 ringside, not 99/1 like Bradley. I suppose IB is kind of a troll on Pac fights, no credibility
I don't think Pac/Bradley is going to be close and competitive. But seeing how the first one was scored, who knows.