Was Pacquaio-Bradley really a robbery?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Royal SpanKING, Apr 3, 2014.


  1. VBOX

    VBOX JOURNEYMAN Full Member

    5,748
    3,893
    Feb 8, 2012
    Pacquiao is a fool for even putting himself in a position to get robbed. I only gave Bradley the rounds where Pac did nothing, still ended up with a 7-5 Pac win but c'mon, he deserved to get robbed.
     
  2. Green Man

    Green Man Guest

    Pacquiao won every round, the only way you have this for Bradley is if you dont know how to score a fight or you are biased towards a certain race. By far one of the biggest if not the biggest robberies of all time.
     
  3. Skellz

    Skellz Member Full Member

    486
    0
    Mar 14, 2014
    How did you score the pacquiao vs marquez 3 fight seeing that you are neither biased nor inept at scoring ?
     
  4. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    402,407
    84,315
    Nov 30, 2006
    :lol::lol:
     
  5. LightsOutJack

    LightsOutJack Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,636
    3
    Feb 21, 2014
    Exactly. There are easily enough rounds to give to Bradley that keep the fight reasonably close without having him winning. Give Bradley less than 3 rounds and ur an idiot/biased ass. Give him more than 5, and ur an idiot/biased ass.

    The thing that really gets me are the people that gave Pac 10 or 11 rounds are the ones saying the rematch is gonna be close and competitive... Interesting how that happened
     
  6. jonze86

    jonze86 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,553
    139
    Sep 14, 2013
    i'm a slight wacko?i scored it 116-112 for pacquaio
     
  7. Overhill

    Overhill Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,960
    5
    Jul 28, 2010
    [yt]WTmQA9GkyBs[/yt]
     
  8. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    402,407
    84,315
    Nov 30, 2006
    Sorry but yeah, kind of. :p

    Which of the following rounds did you not give Bradley?

    1, 8, 10, 11, 12.

    Those were all Bradley rounds.

    The 7th was Pac's on my card but razor-thin. (and that is Jim Lampley's so-called "smoking gun"...which he aired on The Fight Game w/o commentary to prove that Pacquiao was dominating, only to have it show what a close session it actually was...)
     
  9. GeoffJ

    GeoffJ Active Member Full Member

    980
    1
    Dec 25, 2013
    I scored it 8-4 for Pacquiao and
    Pacquiao Marquez III 7-5 for JMM.

    I defend these scores on the basis that this very same poll would be closer if it applied to the third Marquez fight.
     
  10. GeoffJ

    GeoffJ Active Member Full Member

    980
    1
    Dec 25, 2013
    :verysad That's ridiculous.
     
  11. lester proctor

    lester proctor Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,393
    1
    Jul 2, 2011
    Yeah I'll take it from this alt. Check out the number of biased idiots scoring it 10-2, including Danny Garcia and Jeff May weather

    http://boxrec.com/media/index.php/Manny_Pacquiao_vs._Timothy_Bradley
     
  12. The Mongoose

    The Mongoose I honor my bets banned

    24,478
    128
    Aug 13, 2009
    Marquez/Pac III was a close fight. Pac/Bradley was a robbery.

    I don't give a **** what you think
     
  13. lester proctor

    lester proctor Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,393
    1
    Jul 2, 2011
    :lol: that's pathetic. The most controversial of the 3 was near 50/50 ringside, not 99/1 like Bradley. I suppose IB is kind of a troll on Pac fights, no credibility
     
  14. The Mongoose

    The Mongoose I honor my bets banned

    24,478
    128
    Aug 13, 2009
    I don't think Pac/Bradley is going to be close and competitive. But seeing how the first one was scored, who knows.
     
  15. boxing_master

    boxing_master Loyal Member banned

    32,973
    14
    Jul 21, 2013
    :deal