Was pacquiao vs marquez 3 a robbery?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Skellz, Apr 4, 2014.


  1. Skellz

    Skellz Member Full Member

    486
    0
    Mar 14, 2014
    There is always this debate about pacquiao being robbed in the first bradley fight. I do indeed think the fight was closer than people have it, but that pacquiao won it 7-5.

    That being said, I also feel pacquiao lost the marquez 3 fight as well.

    What do you all think about it, and if true, why did pacquiao not get any stick for it like bradley did?
     
  2. boxing_master

    boxing_master Loyal Member banned

    32,973
    14
    Jul 21, 2013
    it was not a robbery it was a close fight and most had pacquaio winning
     
  3. FilipMNE

    FilipMNE Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,394
    11
    Jul 3, 2011
    :rofl:patsch Maybe most Pac fans, JMM won that fight 8 to 4, and i scored it again giving everything possible to Pac and still came out at 7 5 JMM.
    I would not call it robbery per say but not one of judges had JMM winning :tired carefully picked judges for sure!!!
     
  4. divac

    divac Loyal Member Full Member

    31,154
    2,108
    Jul 24, 2004
    The educated boxing media told it like it was, blatant robbery, now the mainstream media who normally does'nt cover boxing, though it was plain to see Pacquiao was gifted, were silent about it because simply their there to root on a bigger event to come, Mayweather vs Pacquiao.
    Mainstream media normally sides with the fighter being hyped, its that simple.
     
  5. Skellz

    Skellz Member Full Member

    486
    0
    Mar 14, 2014
     
  6. Hatesrats

    Hatesrats "I'm NOT Suprised..." Full Member

    60,376
    241
    Sep 28, 2007
    JMM is 4-0 Vs. Packy...
    Maybe 3-0-1 draw
     
  7. Kush

    Kush Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    27,095
    980
    Dec 16, 2007
  8. Staminakills

    Staminakills Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,329
    2,095
    Jun 8, 2012
    it was a robbery per se because NOT on true boxing fan could possibly have paq winning.

    i think it was just as bad as paq v bradley. they were both robberies because the clearly superior winning fighter did not get the dec
     
  9. A|C|S

    A|C|S The original |A|C|S| Full Member

    6,223
    5
    Oct 17, 2013
    I dunno why people gotta defend their fighters all the time

    Im a Berto fan had him losing to Ortiz
    Had Matthysse losing to Garcia

    Everyone loses why defend you're fighter when you know he lost

    Marquez won and it wasnt close
     
  10. Sandman

    Sandman Active Member Full Member

    503
    0
    Sep 15, 2012
    Yeah, it was a robbery. I think PAC vs JMM 3 was arguably a bigger robbery than Bradley vs Pac.
     
  11. Skellz

    Skellz Member Full Member

    486
    0
    Mar 14, 2014
    if so, how come all we hear about is the Bradley's backlash ? Or do the pacquiao fans employ double standards?
     
  12. attaboi

    attaboi Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    7,143
    12
    Feb 19, 2012
    very close fight thought Marquez won but no robbery.
     
  13. Lady Girl

    Lady Girl Kneel Before Zod! Full Member

    31,836
    2,058
    Nov 2, 2013
    butt hurt *****s and juanitas :bart
     
  14. boxing_master

    boxing_master Loyal Member banned

    32,973
    14
    Jul 21, 2013
    dummy the pac vs jmm 3 fight was very close it was nothing like the pac vs bradley fight tim didnt even win one round:deal
     
  15. Green Man

    Green Man Guest

    Hell no perfectly scored fight, if you want to talk about robbery look no further than the first fight where an incompetent judge who made a scoring mistake that prevented Pac from getting the decision. i had the fights 3-1 in Pac's favor and i have an asterisk next to Roidquez win cause hes clear as day that he was juiced to his eyeballs.