Was Pacquaio-Bradley really a robbery?

It was a robbery, anyone who claims otherwise is most likely biased, didn't think the fight was even close to be honest.

 

Robbery of the century.

 

Dude youre an obvious alt, who are you kidding? I duuno about the rest of your nonsensical rant, are you trying to say Garcia and Mayweather are biased for Pac or ignorant of scoring? How about Bradley pal Andre Ward?

http://m.sfgate.com/raiders/tafur/a...ays-Bradley-should-give-belt-back-3628083.php

 

Yes.

 

It was a robbery.

/End Thread.

 

It was not a robbery.

Pac is one of my favourite fighters but he lost that fight, I score it 115-114 in favour of Bradley every time I watch it and I watched it a lot.

Bradley had a broken ankle in that fight but Pacquiao still couldn't catch him at all.
He was wildly swinging at air all night, staying inactive for 2/3 of most of the rounds, and widely giving away the championship rounds.

Never before in my life have I seen punch-stats and commentary that was so far removed from what was actually happening in the ring and I'm still shocked people call this fight a robbery.

The truth is that after Margarito Pac had a stretch of four consecutive fights where he looked like absolute dog-**** and he lost three of those fights before they found a Lightweight he could look decent against (Prime Pac would have massacred Rios à la Diaz).

Maybe the result of Pac - Bradley II will alter publics opinion on this subject.

 

Best you can do for Bradley is 4 rounds if you're looking for any little leverage to give him. As such, a robbery and a bad one.

A proper fair score is 9-3. Fight was a total domination, Bradley scraped some rounds Pac took off. Pac dominated the 8 rounds he cleanly and decisively won.

Stupidity and *****'s say it was competitive.

 

How did he look like **** vs Mosley? He won all rounds, dropped iron chinned Mosley and had him running all night. Thats better than Canelo who couldnt drop his undersized opponent or Floyd who couldnt drop him but almost got dropped. Neither had Shane running.

Most had him dominating undefeated p4p Bradley in 2nd gear. If thats looking like ****, your standards for him are out of this world

The whole post betrays you as a Pac hater, please spare us this transparent fan ****, alt

 

A 9-3 scorecard is way worse than a 7-5 in favour of Bradley imo.

All that ringside scores prove ****, with their limited view and probably paying more attention to the tits of the ringgirls or their twitter than the actual fight anyway, all these people were probably judging purely on who was comming forward and who was moving back, and who was throwing more, without paying attention to the criteria that actually should be used when scoring a fight.

It was a lame fight that Pac gave away bc he was too inactive and inaccurate, Bradleys mediocre performance was good enough to earn a dirty decision.

Everything else is fairy tales.

 

Who would you trust if not an esb alt?

http://m.sfgate.com/raiders/tafur/a...ays-Bradley-should-give-belt-back-3628083.php

 

Andre Ward says Timothy Bradley should give Pacquiao's 147 WBO Belt back. :deal

ANDRE WARD:

"It was a ridiculous decision," said Ward, who was at the fight. "Bradley lost the majority of the rounds. If it was me personally, I would admit defeat and say, 'Here's your belt back''.

 

Mosley was comming of a draw with Sergio Mora going into the Pac-fight if I remember correctly.
That iron chinned warrior got stopped by Mundine ffs...
He was way over the hill even when Floyd fought him.
If you see Canelo as the next big thing thats your issue...
It was a **** fight and Pac was supposed to stop Mosley.

I score a fight using the established criteria (4-factor-system), if that standard is out of this world these days and you score a fight based on the popularity of a fighter and his past, and how entertaining a fighter is than that must have been an innovation that I missed.

I love Pac, he is one of the greatest action-fighters in history and a legend, but that doesn't mean I have to give him rounds he doesn't deserve just because I know how great he once was.

 

Mora was at 157 Cw. Mundine was many years later, again at 154 where Mosley said hes not comfortable and will only fight there for the cash. Pac supposed to stop iron chinned Mosley lol. Gtfo alt

Again dumbass, look at the expert scores for Bradley, close scores were a huge minority, nevermind Bradley win. Let me guess, Swift Garcia, Jeff and Floyd Sr, Bradley pal Andre Ward and 99/100 US boxing writers are biased and dont know **** about boxing. Esb alts is where its at

 

Clear robbery

 

The fact that i can't give Bradley 6 or 7 rounds makes this a robbery. Bradley for sure won rounds 10,11 and 12. You could also argue rounds 1 and 8 in his favor but that is only 5 rounds for Bradley.

Out of all the other rounds, round 7 is the closest but in the 3 or 4 times i've watched this fight i always score that round to pacman. pac always wins rounds 2,3,4,5,6,7 and 9 when i score and i've even given him rounds 1 or 8 sometimes. Anything from 117-111 to 115-113 for Pacman is OK.

Bradley did not win the first fight. Onto the 2nd fight, i just hope its more exciting as on a rewatch the fight was pretty dull without much action, pacman lands a few decent shots on Bradley in one of the rounds though but it felt like a sparring match at times and lacked intensity .