The "All Things Mayweather/Pacquiao" Express!!!!!!

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by IntentionalButt, May 30, 2008.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. MVC!

    MVC! The Best Ever Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2013
    Messages:
    60,129
    Likes Received:
    5,613
    Why do people continue making these stupid threads?

    It's blatantly obvious that they won't fight, let it go.
     
  2. Skellz

    Skellz Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2014
    Messages:
    486
    Likes Received:
    0
    We need to build a stadium for the fight...lmao
     
  3. progamer

    progamer Boxing Junkie banned

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2013
    Messages:
    10,232
    Likes Received:
    0
    his
    got

    B
    I
    G
    G
    E
    R


    :rofl:lol::hi:
     
  4. derrick

    derrick 6ft4 215 bring it on Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2004
    Messages:
    7,534
    Likes Received:
    215
    :rofl
     
  5. VivaNazVegas

    VivaNazVegas Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2011
    Messages:
    2,570
    Likes Received:
    0
  6. buckdacious

    buckdacious Sin~City punks!!! Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2008
    Messages:
    26,774
    Likes Received:
    8
    Mayweather -450
    Pacquiao +300

    WHOOAAAA!!

    Thats pretty fat on Mayweather. bascially that means Mayweather-Canelo, from a sportsbook presepctive, was alot closer fight then Mayweather=PAcquiao would ever be! Mayweather was -275 and Canelo +225

    Back in 2010 when the first odds came out it was Mayweather -115 and Pacqioao -105 meaning Mayweather slight favorite. but now they say this is a total mismatch. I do agree it is but man thats fat.

    Im not saying they still shouldnt fight or anything else u might to say to me directly. I was just looking for odds on Khan-Collazo and they had odds on Mayweather-Pacquiao so i made a thread.

    I dont make the odds so dont talk crap to me. Everybody knows its a mismatch, now theres just odds on it
     
  7. dodong

    dodong >>PACQUIAO Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2007
    Messages:
    28,160
    Likes Received:
    32
    :**** :**** :****

    pacquiao was 3-1 dog against mab. :yep
     
  8. buckdacious

    buckdacious Sin~City punks!!! Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2008
    Messages:
    26,774
    Likes Received:
    8
    Great.....:huh:huh
     
  9. progamer

    progamer Boxing Junkie banned

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2013
    Messages:
    10,232
    Likes Received:
    0
    pac cant beat a guy hiding in africa.
     
  10. ValentinePrince

    ValentinePrince Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2013
    Messages:
    2,869
    Likes Received:
    32
    If I'm not wrong, the line that went up in 2009 had Pacquiao as the favourite.
     
  11. progamer

    progamer Boxing Junkie banned

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2013
    Messages:
    10,232
    Likes Received:
    0
    *****s will take it as another fantasy win for pedjr.
     
  12. Farmboxer

    Farmboxer VIP Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2004
    Messages:
    86,106
    Likes Received:
    4,096
    Void would faint before he got to the ring. Pac is Void's worst nightmare.............
     
  13. Barrera

    Barrera Defeated Boxing_master Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2012
    Messages:
    17,775
    Likes Received:
    1,631
    wrong, go ahead and check floyd was always favored
     
  14. buckdacious

    buckdacious Sin~City punks!!! Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2008
    Messages:
    26,774
    Likes Received:
    8
    I bet the fight, always a favorite. a clown would have to make anybody a favorite over Mayweather
     
  15. HoldMyBeer

    HoldMyBeer Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2010
    Messages:
    12,346
    Likes Received:
    6
    time will be much kinder to Floyd in the ring than it will to pacman
    I doubt pacman has too much left in the tank at an elite level
    so if they did fight now and Floyd won, he would definitely get bragging rights, but it wouldn't mean near as much as it would have 4 years ago
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.