Was pacquiao vs marquez 3 a robbery?

Here's the contradiction in what you posted. 8/20 or 40% didn't see it that way.

 

You've lost the plot. My argument has never turned on any kind of consensus, expert or otherwise. It's merely turned on your ringside expert analysis consisting of neither individuals who were in fact ringside nor who would be considered experts.

Aw shucks. What about unsubtantiated claims that such individuals were in fact ringside? Should anyone have reason to believe your claims whilst throwing this list around, or do you only expect other people to provide sources?

BTW, this is for you sweetheart: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B4VwTFEl20OQcGx4SU0teVVwR00/edit?usp=sharing :smooch Feel free to claim that since I lack a close textual analysis for the ESB alt writers that there may in fact have been more ringside writers than I'm giving credit for, whilst of course providing not a shred of support for your own earlier claims.

But not ringside expertise as you initially claimed. Indeed, I'm glad you agree with me that one need not be ringside to have particular expertise at all. Your earlier statement that 40% of ringside writers had Marquez winning now is not only false, but also irrelevant to the very argument you were attempting to make.

BTW, I'd probably trust Hauser more than most message board people too, but whoopsie daisy, he scored Pac-Bradley for Bradley!

What exactly have you provided so far aside from shifting goal posts and your own unsupported assertions?

 

Gbp Ring commissioned poll of 20 vs 140+ scores on boxrec. Dont make me laugh

 

So in your final analysis how many were ringside and how many not? How about those scored for Marquez?

I thought your point was it was a clear cut robbery. If not, no quarrel here. If so, youve done nothing to bolster your claim since we still have loads of knowledgeable, credible named experts scoring it for Pac whether ringside or on tv. Like i said, id take Houston or Rolds tv score over some anonymous kneejerk pac hater who saw it on tv or stream

 

Grade A Robbery. 8-4 Marquez, wasnt close at all

 

beware of this poster, he doesn't know how to score a fight.

 

all three jmm-pac fight were all close contested fight, the fourth was almost the same but jmm KO's pac on 6th. :good

BTW: i had JMM winning the 3rd fight 115-113.

 

He scored that one right!:deal

 

They were all robberies, that's why Marquez-Pacquaio 4 happened. And so they wouldn't rob Jmm again, KO by 6 happened.

 

Way it looked tho, Manny actually this time WAS on his way to win a clear decision in their fourth fight. Instead he wanted to finish Marquez, a big NONO. Marquez is 41 yrs old ffs. Try to knock him out you get KO'd. Not the biggest puncher, but still the best combination puncher.

 

Wait a minute. Is this a juantard speaking the truth?
Your fellow juantards refuse to believe what you just posted
Glad to know a juantard can speak the truth

 

In any case, my ******* friend, we all must be thankful that Manny's insomnia was finally cured.

 

Manny had the fast hands and feet to beat Jmm to the punch, just not the boxing IQ to do it. Think about it. Bradley can outbox Jmm, but Manny can't? Great fighter, Manny, not a great boxer.

 

I thought it was a close fight, but it doesn't surprise me that most here thought it was a JMM win. Of the rounds that were JMM's decisively they were more decisive than the rounds that were Pacquiao's decisively.

There were quite a few swing rounds that reasonable people can watch and come to different conclusions. You'll note in threads on this board and others when people do a RBR scoring of the fight that even though a strong majority think JMM won 115-113 or 116-112 they can't agree on the individual rounds. It's hard for a group of people to say a fight is a close but clear 115-113 for one fighter when they can't agree on the individual 7 rounds that were actually won.

It's also hard to take opinions seriously when on threads like these the most vocal and vitriolic posts are by posters that are well established as agenda driven *******s or Pacphobes.

Last time I watched it I think I had it as a narrow JMM outpointing, but i'll have to go view it again.

 

No