Who was the more destructive 175 WBO belt holder?

Yep, this is where the insults always start with you, when you can no longer objectively retortbut feel the need to try and prove yyou're right. :-(

 

Eh..I addressed it. He reposted the article I quoted like it was a great discovery, apparently ignorant that I sourced and linked it under the text I quoted. He than accused me of plagarism...:nut

 

I'm just congratulating him on his great detective work.

 

Saturday Night at the Improv is looking for standout jerks, I mean stand up comedians, lmao. Look, I just didn't read your link. I went on the part that you quoted, copied and pasted...and took it from there, lmao. But I would go this route too if I were upset lmao. Good job Archie.

 

Yeah...that was a pretty big mistake before you tried to get cute.

Sorry if you made a complete fool out of yourself, not my fault. I even told you directly it was from Sports Illustrated. I mean wow....

 

2+2=5 is a mistake, lmao. And you're trying so hard too.

The link that you posted didn't solidify your point. It showed how wrong you were and how right JAB was, LMMFAO...!

 

-Accusing someone of plagarism when they credited their source and directly told them where they even got it from is a pretty big mistake.

-No it didn't. I used the article to defend Hill not the other title holders.

 

After Saturday, the DumbGoose wont be around to troll this forum any longer. Just be patient guys...

 

On cue...take your **** alts with you. After Saturday, I don't wnat to see Jab the *** or Blizz Blitz Butt **** on these forums either.

 

:good

Yet fighters say they're going to fight all the time. Where was the contract? If its not ducking as you say than surely Stevenson isn't ducking Sergay, is he? Blizz has shown numerous articles proving Moorer was being avoided . Now you think Moorer should have stuck around even though there was no contract and Hill lost? Come on man, be real!!

 

You wont see anyone after Saturday seeing as your ****** 2+2=5 ass is gonna be outta here, Genius...

 

Not what happened. Read the article.

No, he showed one article that I already linked you won't read. :good

Yeah, show me where I said Moorer should have stuck around.

 

Yep, you are Blizz...

How pathetic, dude.

 

I really wasn't accusing you of plagiarism. It was just hilarious that I read the same article you did, and YOU got something else out of the article.

You used the article to defend Hill??? How?

 

Oh hi Nay_Sayer...yeah, this is stupid.