The "All Things Mayweather/Pacquiao" Express!!!!!!

No. Canelo is not as proven as Bradley at this point.

 

Thats not the point.

If Bradely fought Canelo at 152, who do you think the bookies would have as clear favorite?

Do you think Pacquiao would be 1/3 favorite against Canelo like he was against Bradley?

 

I gotta go with Keith Thurman, Danny Garcia, Canelo, and Golovkin. Off the top of my head. This is assuming we are talking about popularity.

 

Blizzy mate you are a laughing stock.

Delete your account, or get yourself banned. Start a new ALT and problem solved

You are the saddest person i have ever come across you big nose freak of a forum rat you are Mr Pibb and MVC as well

 

Right now Canelo's resume is incomplete. Whether he goes down as an ATG or not depends on a lot of factors including longevity. Edwin Valero for example didn't sustain greatness but he certainly had it. Anyone beating Valero would have a seriously legitimate win. When Diego Corrales was at the top of the P4P lists people expected him to be an ATG but Mayweather disrupted that and knocked him off that path. Had he become an ATG, that win would be bigger for Floyd. I don't rank Chico high on ATG lists but it was still a huge win because of the danger he posed at the time they fought.

To answer your question, if Canelo does become an ATG, Floyd's win will actually get better. Resume does count for the value of a win but it is not the only factor. When you can clearly determine the more dangerous fighter at the time of the fight, that should trump resume. For example, no one will Argue that Leonard's second win over Duran was a better win than the first. Duran's resume had improved but he was clearly not as dangerous a fighter.

I am 99% sure that the Canelo Floyd fought would destroy the Marquez that Floyd fought. Given the fact that the tougher test was Canelo at the time it makes the bigger win. I am 98% sure that the Canelo Floyd fought would KTFO Bradley. Given that there is no reason in my mind to look at the resumes.

I am also 100% sure that if Pac would beat Canelo tomorrow at any weight, these same *******s would consider it Pac's best win ever. Bradley would be an afterthought. There's nothing wrong with liking a particular fighter, the self delusion is a problem. You're entitled to your own opinion, you're not entitled to your own facts.

 

Those names & possibly more :think

Deontay Wilder
G.G.G
Keith Thurman
Oscar Valdez
Naoya Inoue

 

And to be clear, I think a W over Golovkin today is bigger than a W over Canelo because he's the more dangerous fighter.

 

because bradley would have ZERO chance against floyd and canelo.
no chance what so ever. like a million to 0, not even to 1.

and his chances against paq have proven to be far below 50/50.
bradley wouldnt have any chance against all the top 5 ww for god sakes

 

You seem confused. I clearly said Mayweather wins easy, and meant that I dont see why he would duck a pac fight, like many claim he would

 

I did answer the question. I'll make it more clear. Yes. Absolutely. Just like Mayweather's win over Chico is bigger than his win over JMM, even though JMM ranks way higher as an ATG.

 

IF canelo loses in his next fight or 2 that would hurt him badley. he will NOT lose until or unless he ends up fighting ggg.

no one at jmw can touch him and NO ww can moce up and hang with him outside fmj

 

He lost to Pac already - some say twice. He can't Beat Floyd or Canelo. C'mon.

 

I think so. If Mayweather beat Golovkin today I would consider it his best win.

 

Still Pacquiao remains to be a risky opponent compared to the joke opponents Mayweather can easily beat for easy money(Maidana, Khan...etc).

 

Where is the post where I have Broner pfp #2. Where is the post where I said that Berto Dawson and whoever was the third guy are future atg's?

You won't find any, lmao. The same ole sad Pac brigade fans are happy Pac won, lmao.