Pac-Bradley. Another bullcrap decision

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by cereal monotony, Apr 13, 2014.


Page 6 of 9
  1. remi

    remi Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,701
    0
    Jul 7, 2008
    Bob arum: Keep manny away from mayweather!!!!!!!

    That will be the smartest move on your part.

    Keep fighting remtaches with marquez, fight bradley again, then rios, but stay away from mayweather, a total mismatch!!!!
     
    remi, Apr 14, 2014
    remi, Apr 14, 2014
    #76
  2. Low37

    Low37 Active Member Full Member

    606
    0
    Sep 21, 2009
    Spot on:deal
     
    Low37, Apr 14, 2014
    Low37, Apr 14, 2014
    #77
  3. Beatle

    Beatle Sheer Analysis Full Member

    9,270
    269
    Apr 12, 2009
    Bradley always has an excuse, and it's always his legs. If his legs are so f___ed up, then he's just not that good.
     
    Beatle, Apr 14, 2014
    Beatle, Apr 14, 2014
    #78
  4. vargasfan1985

    vargasfan1985 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,473
    4,886
    Mar 8, 2008
    Not sure what is worse. Thinking Bradley won both fights, or betting on Bradley to win the rematch.

    I've never seen a fighter have public opinion in his favor, nearly 100%, and the less than 1% swear the other guy won.

    Pac won BOTH fights convincingly. He won the first fight even MORE convincingly than this one.

    Idiots...I am so glad none of you are judges.
     
    vargasfan1985, Apr 14, 2014
    vargasfan1985, Apr 14, 2014
    #79
  5. TheCrazyCal

    TheCrazyCal Baby Faced Hassassin Full Member

    575
    1
    Apr 14, 2013
    there`ll be a trilogy..
     
    TheCrazyCal, Apr 14, 2014
    TheCrazyCal, Apr 14, 2014
    #80
  6. vargasfan1985

    vargasfan1985 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,473
    4,886
    Mar 8, 2008
    No, there will not.
     
    vargasfan1985, Apr 14, 2014
    vargasfan1985, Apr 14, 2014
    #81
  7. jas

    jas ★ Legends: B-HOP ; PAC ★ Full Member

    16,150
    11
    Jan 14, 2011
    :lol:
     
    jas, Apr 14, 2014
    jas, Apr 14, 2014
    #82
  8. expljose

    expljose Active Member Full Member

    1,259
    447
    Nov 6, 2013
    1 TB 2 MP 3 MP 4 TB 5 MP 6 MP 7 MP 8 MP 9 MP 10 MP 11 TB 12 MP

    118 manny pacqiao 110 Tim bradley
     
    expljose, Apr 14, 2014
    expljose, Apr 14, 2014
    #83
  9. bust3r

    bust3r Active Member Full Member

    550
    0
    Dec 6, 2008
    you are lost dickhead you are way out of the topic.
     
    bust3r, Apr 14, 2014
    bust3r, Apr 14, 2014
    #84
  10. Windigo

    Windigo Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,131
    3
    Jun 22, 2009
    That was my card. I'm dead set against this tendency to give a close round to the guy who is losing.

    Score minute by minute and if the round is close at the end look back at your card.
     
    Windigo, Apr 14, 2014
    Windigo, Apr 14, 2014
    #85
  11. lobk

    lobk Original ESB Member Full Member

    29,703
    19,234
    Jul 19, 2004
    Look at this clowns score card. He gave rnds 3 and 4 to Bradley. No sane boxing fan gave that to Bradley. The only thing Pac didn't do in rnds 3 and 4 was knock Bradley down. Bradley had very little offense and was eating some very good punches from Pac in these rnds.

    cereal monotony is a trolling idiot.
     
    lobk, Apr 14, 2014
    lobk, Apr 14, 2014
    #86
  12. Thread Stealer

    Thread Stealer Loyal Member Full Member

    41,964
    3,447
    Jun 30, 2005
    Pacquiao deserved the decision.

    118-110 is too wide though.
     
    Thread Stealer, Apr 14, 2014
    Thread Stealer, Apr 14, 2014
    #87
  13. Windigo

    Windigo Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,131
    3
    Jun 22, 2009
    Define too wide a decision? You score rounds not how close you think the fight was. You don't just give Bradly the 5th and the 11th to keep it close. That is one of the biggest problems in boxing judging today. The fighter that is losing starts winning the close rounds out of pity.
     
    Windigo, Apr 14, 2014
    Windigo, Apr 14, 2014
    #88
  14. vargasfan1985

    vargasfan1985 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,473
    4,886
    Mar 8, 2008
    I thought 10-2 was wide, 8-4 or 9-3 was perfect.
     
    vargasfan1985, Apr 14, 2014
    vargasfan1985, Apr 14, 2014
    #89
  15. Windigo

    Windigo Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,131
    3
    Jun 22, 2009
    8-4 means you gave the 5th and the 11th to Bradly for no other reason then to keep the fight close. That isn't good judging.

    A close fight can have a wide decision because we don't score based on the entire fight.
     
    Windigo, Apr 14, 2014
    Windigo, Apr 14, 2014
    #90
Page 6 of 9