Even his super dick rider Jim BANG BANG Lampley said during Morales Vs Raheem @7:55 in the video "I don't think Manny Pacquiao should try to fight Zahir Raheem" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uB1vqJj9GvI
Shylock was adamant in the postfight that Morales/Pac was still all-go despite Morales dropping every round to Raheem. I just do what my promoter tells me, ya know?
Join date: oct 2013. Is that also when you started watching boxing? How about the fact that Pac was scheduled a rematch with morales at SFW whilst Raheem fought at LW. If that's not enough, how about the fact that Raheem lost the following match vs friestas before pac even stepped into LW for a tune up with Diaz, and immediately after that jumped 2 weight divisions for Oscar. What a duck!
1st of all don't even bring up Manny goin up to fight a drained, dehydrated, done ass ODLH Like @uNF said they were adamant about fighting Morales again after he lost to Raheem becuz he wanted no parts of Raheem Even the major ******* Lampley said this
Exactly. Raheem was fighting at 135. Manny fought at 130 at the time, who only moved up to 130 a few fights before that. When he fought Morales again in January 2006 at 130, Raheem had his fight with Freitas in April of 2006 and lost the fight by SD. Now why would Pac fight a guy coming out of a loss and has no fanbase? Some of you guys are so delusional.
You tell me, because that's exactly what he did when Manny decided to fight Joshua Clottey over Mayweather. And Manny sure is short on title defenses in his career considering the number of titles he has won. Just saying.
Exactly T!hey wanna change how they view different fighters lol And of course this is just one of Manny's duck jobs
And are people trying to act like Manny doesn't fight people coming off losses -Cough- Garbageman Rios lol