The "All Things Mayweather/Pacquiao" Express!!!!!!

Which is it blacks or Mexicans? Oh, you clowns switch it up to favor your weak arguments. I don't care about any of you clowns agendas from yours to the TS. You're all clowns to me. Anytime you clowns resort to your phony ass bigotry and cosigning the bigotry, I laugh my ass off.

 

I'v never seen SRL on anyone's top 10 P4P list.

I'd pick Floyd over Duran and SRL though. Duran by UD, SRL by SD .

 

I hear you, plus back then you had to be more than just an elite fighter to get paid. You had to have charisma and bring something new to the table. Pryor nor Arguello got the money they should have gotten and even Hagler didn't get the big payday until he fought Leonard. Ali was hogging all the cash at the top. As a matter of the fact, the heavyweight division was the ****. Those smaller guys had to be really special. Having said that, I also have to say that Floyd and Pac are just born winners and if you are a winner, it makes no different what era you're in.

 

I didn't say he couldn't fight. In fact I said Pac won't beat him. Its just that he's so fokking boring and his opponents are all cherrypicked and has no chance of winning but still he sells millions of PPV buy. That's being great at conning people out. :good

 

In case you haven't noticed, he fights the top fighters of the division.. I think Pac has no chance of beating him.. Does that mean Pac is a cherry pick? If I was Mayweather, I would continue to do what I'm doing if everyone is considered a cherry pick.. F y'all.. I'm 37 years old I don't have to prove myself anymore.. I'm Joan when he played for the Wizards...

 

anyone?

 

Pac took that 0 two years ago

 

^we know that. i mean officially, with the recent win. or is having the 0 no longer relevant?

 

An 0 is relevant depending on the quality of opposition.

Bradleys 0 was pretty significant and i dont know what you are talkin about, to me and alot of people i know we rate it as one of pacs top 5 wins

 

yeah..#5 for me.

 

Pacquiao was expected to win. Alto I did believe Bradley would make it a close fight he did himself no favors fighting the way he did. I think the main reason is Bradley doesn't get the credit he deserves, plus Pacquiao the killer didn't get the ko.

 

Pac has not been a "killer" since way before he got nearly killed by JMM.

 

That's the problem, Pacquiao is popular because he was demolishing guys. Now they say he's compassionate, taking it easy on guys. What other boxer would they say that about? I do believe it was a true qaulity win, but Bradley is underrated and underappreciated fan wise.

 

Going back to Oscar, the records of the fighters of Floyd's opponents at the time of his fights was 351 - 21, I'm excluding draws as well. This is around a 94% winning percentage. Only Floyd can have his opponents from 2007 win 94% of their fights and Floyd is still considered to be cherry picking them. Mindbogglingly crazy argument or else you are just recognizing that Floyd is the greatest of his era.

 

Bradley shouldve lost to provodnikov