Did Alex Leapai hurt Wlad Klitschko more than Haye did?

Put down the crack pipe, Wlad was never hurt and put up a masterclass perfomance last night.

You are clearly mad.

 

Read on fool.

 

Haye hurt Wlad's KO percentage, so he obviously hurt him the most. :bart

 

Haye withdrew from the fight after getting hit hard once. At least Leapai tried.

Wlad was not hurt in the Leapai fight at all.

 

Wow. Never seen another fighter bring out such absurd reactions from the rabble.

 

Ok you proved some points there to be fair.

I don't like people making out Wlad is invincible, he's got just as much flaws as other guys at HW.

I'm not a Klit hater, I still think Vitali could beat everyone, even now.

He's one of my favourite fighters and I can understand when people were calling him unbeatable, he barley had any flaws.

You're telling me guys like Stiverne, Pulev, Chisora, Fury or Perez don't have the style to beat him? These are the type of guys who aren't just going let Wlad hold them, these guy want to win.

They know how to slip a jab (bar Fury), are strong and can rip him inside, How is Wlad going to react when a guy his weight is on his chest? He's got no inside game and is clueless when a guy can slip his jab.

He's not a level ahead of anyone.

 

Haye put on one of the most disgraceful performances I have ever seen especially for a guy that talked **** for 3 years :rofl

 

"Alex was looking for the right moment and the right shot and I swear if one of those shots had landed anywhere near my head I would not be sitting here tonight.

"This is 112kgs of pure muscle and power and I am sure Alex will be able to beat a lot of boxers in the division."

Wlad is way too kind for his opponents.

 

You were right about wlad not being level above the guys you mentioned. They are all two levels below Wlad. They have half of the chance povetkin or Haye had, go figure.

 

Wlad would beat all those guys handily, and by that time there would be new prospects on the scene and you would say that they are the ones to beat him.

Why not just give Wlad credit? He has dealt with all styles and sizes, his jab is hard to slip and he doesn't let opponents inside, no matter how strong they are they won't be as strong as him.

Wlad keeps winning because of what he does, not what others don't do.

 

Such a crappy heavyweight division.

 

Povetkin was too small and simply not that good.

That was the best Wlad I've ever seen against Haye, he's faded since.

And give up on this Povetkin hype, what does he have which is so special?

 

Wlad keeps winning because he fights guys like Leapai and Pianeta.

The guys I mentioned are naturally big non juiced up guys and would manhandle him in clinches just like Peter and Wach did, only these guys have the talent as well.

****ing nuthugger.

 

Yes, Wlad is utter crap. He's been the luckiest fighter ever in dominating the division for 7 or so years.

 

pulev is a far more skilled a fighter than Leapai.

Will he beat Vlad? Probably not. However, Pulev at least has some skills and size.

Leapai was simply a tough brawler, a fighter that could use his toughness to get past non top skilled heavy weights.

Lets not forget Vlad can hit from long range with very good power while being strong enough to tie up his opponents at short range. Tough combination to match up against. Not a very exciting boxing style. A very effective boxing style.