you guys are overrating thurman. he has a walmart chin - MADE IN CHINA!! prov would have him on ***** street in the 1st round.
Thurman has the size advantage but he has the hand speed of a 44 year old George Foreman, okay maybe not THAT slow but he's pretty goddamn slow in the hands for such a young guy, David Tua, a HW who was twice his size probably possessed superior handspeed. Provodnikov, on the other hand, is tough as hell, has never been hurt or backed down, a whole different animal, Thurman has been wobbled and backed down many times. Provodnikov would walk him down and brutalize him until Thurman breaks not unlike what he did to Alvarado, who also was a hard hitting boxer puncher with a 9 pound size advantage over Provodnikov.
thurman can move and go forward. i think he would forward and if ruslan got the better of him then he would box and move more. rulslan can bring it but power is what keeps a guy off your ass. if he respects your power he will think twice and trust me ruslan would think twice and even 3 & 4 times fighting thurman. thurman by ko in a war !
Brad forgot bout the chip on his shoulder after the first minute of round 1. Dumb ass. Bradley was 3 p4p at the time. Alvarado beats the **** out of Thurman's last 5 fights alone. Big dumb loopy shots vs. Short fast shots. Provo=never been rocked, thurman=shaky chin. You=sad little ***** who can't win a logical arguement so starts making asinine erroneous statements n presenting them as facts. Sorry you are so stupid *****. It's not my fault.
I ain't on no ones nuts *****. I presented a very logical assessment and it goes against the guy who's nuts your on so of course I'm on someone's nuts. Your whole arguement here is based on conjecture. I picked maidana to assface what the **** that have to do with ****? Broner don't move. His feet or his head. Didn't take special vision to see what was gonna happen.
So you just read the fist sentence?? atsch :rofl I get it, by ur pathetic over-emotional response I see what's going on... I know who's nuts you actually ride, and why ur hating on Thurman becuz he's a threat (or at least being seen as a threat) to your favorite fighter My response was a very logical assessment to you, and included the exact same "get off his nuts" line you gave me... I see between the 2 of us, your an emotional little dick riding ****** that can't take someone breaking this sport down for you cause all you wanna do is ride some nuts This is ur argument, ***** Hop off the dick head and learn something about boxing ya pansy
Haha. See bit.ch. only way u can even try to win a debate is by making up fake quotes. That's sad. Lots of homo***ual overtones. Seeing as how all those thoughts originated from your half wit ass brain...well, says a lot. Unlike your posts about boxing. Clear your head chump. You can try another day. Ps- I didn't miss your "point" about msidana vs broner...you didn't make one. You just stated that most people were surprised but YOU knew it was gonna happen. What the **** is the point there? That your psychic? Awsome at predicting fights? ?? You said "for example" at the beginning as if you were making a point but in reading the preceding paragraph, I could not make a connection. You said there's some things you should be able to tell sbout a fighter before he fights a name. Right? Were broner and maidana both established guys who had fought high levels of competition? At least higher than thurman has. Your point if there is one is extremely muddled. Probably becuz your fukkin stupid. And then you went on with a bunch of conjecture n assumptions. Nowhere saying anything that would matter in a reasonable analysis. All I did was make a logical assessment and first **** from your mouth is I'm on someone's nuts. If u can't handle a harsh response don't say incendiary ****. You may be a fan but you don't understand **** about this sport. As evidenced by your stupid nonsensical posts.
For conversations sake if this ever did happen, I noticed Keith gets alil sloppy and trigger happy when pressured, like in one or 2 instances that Diaz went after him. On those exchanges Diaz actually didn't do bad. It was when he stayed in the center of the ring, he was a sitting duck, target practice for the faster Thurman. A non-stop come forward berserker like Prov or an intelligent pressure fighter like Matthysse would push Thurman to his limit. Both Prov and Matthysse have dealt with fast fighters before Thurman is nothing new. Unless KT boxed intelligently I don't think he knocks these guys out.
A point I tried to make to dumbass. Thurman cracks under pressure a bit it seems. Provo would be a nightmare for a guy like that. And Thurman's gets around good but his hand speed ain't nothin to write home about. Provo wins on the inside with his much shorter faster shots inside Keith's loopers. And if thurman tries lapping around the ring like he did with karass he will get cornered. It's a very clear thing to see that ruslan cuts a ring off very effectively. I've seen ruslan cracked with shots n cut up but never jarred. I've seen thurman get dazzled by guys who ain't even known as big punchers. Does thurman got a chance? Sure. I just think that the obvious things to look for go in ruslans favor.
:rofl "making up quotes" he says I'm pretty sure anyone else in the world would understand what I was doing there... Summarizing ur dumb ass argument! I wasn't trying to convince anyone that you actually said it, but clearly it tripped you up for a second! What do I expect, YOU'RE A MORON!!! That's not how I won the argument, I won the argument by being SMARTER than you! And who the hell puts "P.S." in the middle of their dumb ass long bull**** infested comment? P.S. GOES AT THE END YOU DUMB ***** And, YOU OBVIOUSLY DIDN'T GET THE POINT atsch... You skipped the most important point "BY THE WAY HE FIGHTS"... Dumbass And clearly by misunderstanding that, you misunderstand what I said after... And instead of explaining WHY like a competent person would, you just call it "conjecture n assumptions" and leave... Cause that's a lot easier than actually using ur brain You're just a little ***** that can dish it but can't take it... U tell me to get off Thurman's nuts, I tell you to get off Provo's nuts, and that just ends any semblance of an analytical argument as far as ur concerned cause you clearly have something to hide... Like the fact that you ride lots and lots of nuts... :rofl P.S. Stop trying to use big words that you don't understand when ur dumbass isn't even smart enough to use "P.S." correctly P.P.S. LEARN HOW PARAGRAPHS WORK JACKASS (See... That's how it's done)
Christ...the fact that u think I used "big words" shows your stupidity. I don't care about how anyone's paragraphs or anything are put together, but since u brought it up I will point a couple things out. You do not start sentences with conjunctions. Doing that while trying to argue the English language shows your stupidity. Starting multiple paragraphs with conjunctions shows ultra stupidity. Breaking your incorrectly written sentences into spaced blocks does not make them proper paragraphs. A fifth grade English teacher would have a field day with your horrid writing. Your arguements have eroded into nonsensical drivel and that's when I call it quits. You are not smart and what's worse is you don't know boxing. Sorry pal.