Provodnikov vs. Thurman.

:deal

 

"Trying to argue the English language" is the one thing you got out of that whole response! atsch

Well, anything to keep from talking about boxing, right?:rofl

This is you

So yeah, go ahead and take ur leave while the argument is on English grammar, cause it might wind up going back to boxing analysis, in which case you're clearly limited.

Also I hope ur whole family dies in a fire.

 

Now your unquenched passion for Keith has u wishing his naysayers and their families would die in a fire? I wonder if thurman gives half a **** about your undying love for him.

 

Keep running from the boxing discussion you fukking coward! Focus on all the little insults, all the grammar errors! Anything to keep the discussion away from boxing! :rofl

 

Hahaha you stopped talking boxing long ago. Who brought up the grammar in first place? You did. Why did you? Becuz you couldn't argue boxing with me. Turns out you can't argue grammar with me either. So now you want to go back to boxing? Go n read my posts from top n previous page. My piece was said long ago. I just been watching you dig your own hole for my personal amusement. Even lent you the shovel. Sucker.

 

Lights out jack!!! Hahahahahaha. Is it the lisp that gets you so hot n bothered? Yea, I bet it's the lisp.

 

I really like both guys but as of now I have Provodikov (who I've yet to see significantly wobbled) over One Time (who I have)... I think Thurman just gets hit too much and hurt too much and might struggle against Ruslans relentless come forward pressure.

 

I didn't bring up grammar, I brought up paragraphs... No one wants to read ur pathetic dribble in one clunky paragraph. Ur just so desperate to keep the conversation away from boxing that you decided to run with the whole grammar angle.

And speaking of who started what, which one of us was the one that took the conversation away from boxing? You ***** boy! I said "Someone's on someone's nuts" right before laying down some boxing knowledge on ur pathetic ass...

Instead of throwing an insult back just before retorting by analysis like I did to you, you decided to act like an internet bully and call me a ***** and act as if I took things way too far...

Why? Becuz what I said was indisputable fact, and instead of admitting it, or leaving, you have to convince urself something else happened... Sorry ur mom wasn't here to do it as usual, she was likely blowing ur friends... Oh wait, u don't have friends, I meant ur neighbor... hood...

If I can't argue boxing with u, than bring the conversation back to boxing and try me? We both know ur not gonna, cause ur a fukking coward... Ur not fooling anyone

 

Are you getting horny trying to guess, you fukking ******?

Thinking about what gets me off seems to really tickle ur fancy... Definitely more than talking boxing does.

 

Your right lets get back to boxing. This is the "boxing knowledge" u "dropped." It's all You've said about boxing and it doesn't say anything. Please point out the knowledge.

 

That's a real quote. Not somethin I made up to try n insult u. Tho I'm sure to most it's hard to tell.

 

Oh, would u look at that... I'll break it down for you...

The point was that if you know the ins and outs of boxing technique, not just "who beat who and how", you can see how certain fights will go before either fighter fights a "name" opponent. Casuals thought Broner would beat Maidana becuz he was perceived as a slick boxer, but in reality he's a stationary flat footed fighter with a defensive stance he doesn't know how to use...

In regards to Thurman:

Seeing the technique, the defense, speed, grittiness and power of Chavez shows that he's a much more difficult fighter to beat than Provodnikov from a technical stand point... He overcame Thurman's early onslaught and took him into deep waters... Thurman overcame that test...

That doesn't impress you becuz Chavez isn't a name??

This is just a quick way to show you how limited Provodnikov is as a fighter. Sure he's powerful, sure he's tough... But how does that lead you to favor him over Thurman?

Bradley and Herrera beat him! Both are slick boxers like Thurman, but with feather fists... Thurman's not feather fisted...

Alavarado?? Does beating Rios somehow prove Alvarado is a better fighter than Thurman? Outboxing a walking punching bag after getting knocked out by him one fight before?

Think about it...

 

No... You didn't get it so I had to break it down to you like a child... Just read the breakdown, and have it... Assuming you have the boxing knowledge to do so...

 

Wtf, prov is a phuking c skilled fighter. My god, people are going nuts because he put a beating on Bradley in a losing effort. Bradley was never ever in a million years top 10 talent p4p wtf..
In reality he was never even a true top 10 fighter in the ww div alone.. Getting a gift against paq in no way shape or form does that all the sudden make Bradley a top p4per.

Holy **** this board is out of control. Bradley has never beat a friggin ww for god sakes and his lack of skill and zero technique has been on display for years now. Look how sloppy and weak he looked vs Provo and paq... That's a b level talent at best.

Thurman would end proves career within 6 rounds. 2 totally different level of fighter in every aspect of this fight game, wow