Who has the better SMW resume Froch or Ward... Think

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by bailey, May 1, 2014.


  1. bailey

    bailey Loyal Member Full Member

    39,973
    3,105
    Dec 11, 2009
    Terrible attitude.
    Look at how A Khan is still fighting in America after he looked to have beaten a fighter in a fight where he had 2 points deducted, an opponent who failed a test, where there was someone who was seen with judges and after the result celebrated with the fighter given the decision and there was a big wait for the scorecards to be announced, yet you think Dirrell who was outlanded and a ref who was a bit quick in many opinions to stop a fight is a good reason :patsch:-(
     
  2. bailey

    bailey Loyal Member Full Member

    39,973
    3,105
    Dec 11, 2009
    You hid away for a long time after pulling a duck, come back later and write this when still ducking the question


    Please stop ducking. I have noticed how you have been discarded by posters as a joke and ignored, yet I am giving you a chance to man up.
    The question again

    Tell me the better opposition in your opinion

    You made a comment about Ward having fought better comp, so please break this down in YOUR opinion
     
  3. bailey

    bailey Loyal Member Full Member

    39,973
    3,105
    Dec 11, 2009
    I wonder that also

    I agree with that, I also think the Kessler Calzaghe beat was better than the Kessler, Ward beat

    Kessler was never the same after his first defeat. Watch his next fight after where he was badly wobbled.

    Still its a good win for all 3 overall



    I do question how people think Froch is a better win than Kessler when Froch lost to Kessler, beat a former MW (whos big win was?) coming off a loss and then fights an old boiled down SMW journeyman to a Mdec, the same SMW journeyman who when prime couldnt compete at SMW. Thats not good form at all. What Froch did do was remove the Bute risk and I think Ward fans rate that as Ward was not interested in Bute and because many would have favoured Bute if they fought
     
  4. LoRd_inFamousX1

    LoRd_inFamousX1 Lord of the Square Rings Full Member

    4,133
    4
    May 18, 2012
  5. Imperial1

    Imperial1 VIP Member Full Member

    54,515
    121
    Jan 3, 2007

    He should fight in the UK but his reasons not to are valid ?You guys live to protect your fighters ..

    I mean the officiating in both those fights weren't bad they horrendous !


    Did Froch not get a fair shake in AC ?

    It could be made it just will most likely be here ..
     
  6. loughlan

    loughlan Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,896
    0
    Feb 9, 2010
    :good Not only did Froch get a fair shake the judges were too generous to him.

    Why the **** would Ward risk his unbeaten record to fight in one of the most corrupt boxing nations in the world? Because Bailey says he should I guess.

    Oh and Bailey, Froch landed maybe 5 meaningful shots v Dirrell, but you know this already.
     
  7. Tancred

    Tancred Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,338
    4
    May 2, 2014
  8. bailey

    bailey Loyal Member Full Member

    39,973
    3,105
    Dec 11, 2009
    Terrible answer to.
    Look at how Khan was treated and tell me anything was that bad with the fights you have mentioned.
    Also this comment of - You guys live to protect your fighters .. - Groves is from the same country as Froch :nut:patsch.
    Did Khan get a fair shake?
     
  9. bailey

    bailey Loyal Member Full Member

    39,973
    3,105
    Dec 11, 2009
    I havent said any boxer should do anything of the sort.
    This is your insecurity.
    Froch outlanded Dirrell. Get over that. Dirrell held constantly.
    Cant see how the judges were generous to Froch, it was a close fight
     
  10. bailey

    bailey Loyal Member Full Member

    39,973
    3,105
    Dec 11, 2009
    Please explain
     
  11. loughlan

    loughlan Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,896
    0
    Feb 9, 2010
    No Bailey Froch did not outland Dirrell, he barely landed at all. Now instead of the usual response, if you could post a video of all these shots landed by Froch I will accept it. If you want to see the shots Dirrell landed there's a video on youtube for all to see.

    You did indeed imply that Ward should fight in Britain - one of the most shamelessly corrupt boxing nations - in your response to the poster who remarked on the Froch v Dirrell fiasco.
     
  12. bailey

    bailey Loyal Member Full Member

    39,973
    3,105
    Dec 11, 2009
     
  13. Gannicus

    Gannicus 2014 Poster of the Year Full Member

    13,452
    2,990
    Mar 4, 2014
    Ward. Carl has losses, and Ward has a win over Carl, as well as wins against a far better version of Kessler, whereas Carl lost to prime Kessler.
    The smaller wins are of less strength than a win over the very top in the division.
     
  14. loughlan

    loughlan Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,896
    0
    Feb 9, 2010
     
  15. SweetSciGuru

    SweetSciGuru Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,132
    5
    Feb 23, 2014
    Of course it's Ward. No doubt.

    Ward's resume is better than Froch's, and Froch's resume is better than Calzaghe's.
    Calzaghe struggled with a young Kessler, and Froch loss to a prime Kessler.
    Ward beat Kessler's ****** ass easily and almost sent him to sit along Calzaghe in retirement.

    Ward's win over Chad Dawson is better than anything on Calzaghe or Froch's resumes and the way that he beat Dawson with 3 knock downs and a TKO is something that neither Calzaghe or Froch could hope to replicate.

    LOL. I think that Froch would have his hands full even beating Edwin Rodriquez.