Pac Marquez 1. "How can you score 10-7 in a three knockdown round"

Did that one judge have Marquez somehow winning on his combinations with that score? Or was it just an error.

It doesn't make sense with three knockdowns, but maybe I am missing something here

 

pac got robbed of a win in the first fight this is well known the judge ****ed up

 

Harold Lederman gave a really weird excuse. He said something like 'some judges are hesitant to score it any wider than 10-7 because it puts one fighter into too much of a hole on the cards'. Yeaaahhhhh, okay.... if you don't want to lose points, then don't get knocked down.

 

Lederman said that in the Mayweather/Corrales fight, which occurred three years before the first Marquez/Pacquiao fight.

 

Maybe. I don't remember when he said it.

I just remember he said it.

Don't really buy the explanation though.

 

The fact that he said it 3 years before the Marquez/Pacquiao fight, at least shows that it's not something that he simply made up to defend the judge.

 

What's crazier is that it wasn't reversed/corrected after the fight! :nut

 

10-6 round means manny only needed 3 rds to win the fight. he won the 2nd, last and im sure from rds 3 - 11 manny also won some rounds.

 

Judge messed up,thats all

 

the judge did come out to say that he made an error.

 

*******s resorting to bitching about the very first round of the very first fight

 

I scored the round 10-6 and still had Marquez winning. A draw is fair though

 

Had Pac winning by a point

 

And i had Marquez winning by a point.
Seems like a draw was the best result. I am happy they got a draw.

 

PAC punched Jmm while he was down. :-(

Judge did the right thing taking a point away but if it was me I would've taken 3 points