british stoppages

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by lepinthehood, May 17, 2014.


  1. TBooze

    TBooze Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,495
    2,179
    Oct 22, 2006
    I think to be fair the referees do not use it as an excuse, in this thread I brought it up.

    I agree boxing is a 'calculated risk', and there will be further deaths and injuries, but it is important that administrators and officials minimize that risk as often fighters are prepared to go 'above and beyond' what should be tolerated.
     
  2. Robney

    Robney ᴻᴼ ᴸᴼᴻᴳᴲᴿ ᴲ۷ᴵᴸ

    94,674
    29,583
    Jan 18, 2010
    The point is that it's so clear that it's not about protecting the fighter at all. Otherwise the teak-tough Ghanians and Lituanian busdrivers of this world would have their fair share of premature stoppages in their favor too.
    But you never ever see one when a British fighter is doing a little unscripted dance against one of them.
     
  3. TBooze

    TBooze Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,495
    2,179
    Oct 22, 2006
    But that is boxing as a whole, not just British boxing. Watch Gonzales/CoggiI in Argentina or Holmes/Snipes for two examples of inept officiating outside this Country.

    British boxing has never been safer. British boxing has never been cleaner. British boxing is thanks in part to Olympic money, building a depth in quality not seen this side of the Second World War.

    The glass is very much half full. And even of you still believe in this 'British Stoppage' spin, remember plenty of good can come from it. For starters the Biggest domestic fight this Country has seen for perhaps twenty odd years (Froch/GrovesII)...
     
  4. AlFrancis

    AlFrancis Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,813
    848
    Jul 25, 2008
    I'm curious T. Do you play a part in the British fight scene or are you just a fan of boxing?
     
  5. Two Shakes

    Two Shakes Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,927
    176
    Sep 7, 2008
    Absolutely brilliant.

    Why don't we do away with padding in gloves as well.
     
  6. lefthook82

    lefthook82 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,692
    778
    May 1, 2009
    That not a british stopage for me

    British stoppage is Purdy v Rivera. Could smell it a mile off
     
  7. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,747
    21,593
    Nov 24, 2005
    If it's about safety, I'd rather they just banned boxing in this country.
    Because too many of these 'humanitarian' stoppages happen to look like corruption/favouritism/injustice.

    Now they are even using these controversies to contrive big-money PPV rematches, just like they do with the bad judges' decisions.

    Let's end the confusion one way or the other.
    Boxing is dangerous, immoral so ban it .... OR ... continue it, but in a FAIR, SPORTING manner, where both fighters are given an equal chance to win.
     
  8. Westy78

    Westy78 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,405
    0
    May 24, 2013
    He had a broken jaw, eye was closing and he was eating right hands, the ref could have let it go on but I understand the decision.
     
  9. TBooze

    TBooze Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,495
    2,179
    Oct 22, 2006
    LOL, no I am a fan!
     
  10. AlFrancis

    AlFrancis Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,813
    848
    Jul 25, 2008
    Ok mate, just asking. lol.
     
  11. AlFrancis

    AlFrancis Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,813
    848
    Jul 25, 2008
    That last paragraph or should I say sentence says it all.
     
  12. TBooze

    TBooze Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,495
    2,179
    Oct 22, 2006
    No offence but there is no confusion. Boxing has always had a political aspect to it, that is part of its attraction, it is a grey sport, not a black and white one. I for one would not want that to change.