If Floyd Mayweather is a cherry picker; Then why did he pick those cherries?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by BetterThenYou, May 23, 2014.


  1. BetterThenYou

    BetterThenYou Active Member Full Member

    838
    0
    May 21, 2014
    Mayweather has arguably the best resume in current boxing today. You know his accomplishments and accolades so re-iterating them would be pointless.
    The man gets called a cherry picker. Some would say rightfully so. He only fights for business and not legacy. Well if that's the case. Then why did Floyd Mayweather pick those cherries at that point in his and their career?

    What flaws did Floyd see in his opposition to make him so confident on signing for that fight? He's a cherry picker who has picked some pretty tough fights down the line.

    Floyd has the mind set that if you have already lost then somebody has figured you out and he will too. But he has his fair share of undefeated fighters on his resume too; Canelo, Hatton, Corrales.

    At that point in time when floyd 'cherry picked' his opposition; why did they get picked? Im talking about:

    Undefeated favourtie; Corrales
    Mexican legend - Chavez
    Why 'cherry pick' a guy he arguably lost to in Castillo the rematch
    Moving up to fight Gatti
    De La Hoya
    An undefeated Hatton
    A known cheat in Mosley who everyone begged him to fight for years after coming off his most impressive win against Margo
    Cotto - Another fighter everyone begged him to fight after coming off his personal career highlight win over Margo in the rematch
    Canelo - An unproven yet dangerous fight who is naturally a weight class bigger than him


    Why are were these fighters cherry picked at that particular time?
     
  2. MoJoGoodie

    MoJoGoodie Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,905
    118
    Nov 29, 2011
  3. progamer

    progamer Boxing Junkie banned

    10,232
    0
    Nov 25, 2013
    stopped there.

    thanks for the laugh.:rofl
     
  4. BetterThenYou

    BetterThenYou Active Member Full Member

    838
    0
    May 21, 2014
    Thats why i wrote arguably. Arguably means some people argue for it and others like you oppose it. I dont say he has the best resume. I say he arguably has.
     
  5. BetterThenYou

    BetterThenYou Active Member Full Member

    838
    0
    May 21, 2014
    It doesnt matter if you highlight two words. Its about context. I wrote ARGUABLY
     
  6. MVC.

    MVC. Guest

    Incredible post :deal

    Floyd has the best resume by a mile

    Top 3 ATG for sure.
     
  7. BetterThenYou

    BetterThenYou Active Member Full Member

    838
    0
    May 21, 2014
    Why do you think he gets called a cherry picker when he has a great resume MVC?
     
  8. MVC.

    MVC. Guest

    People are afraid of how good he is. So they say the silliest things. Fear leads to anger, anger leads to hate, hate leads to suffering. These *******s have been suffering for a long time
     
  9. rtm32

    rtm32 Member Full Member

    192
    0
    Jun 9, 2012
    every single fight floyd has ever had will be seen as a cherry pick by his haters. Literally every single fight. Its been like that since the beginning. First they say he is ducking this person and that this person would beat him, floyd fights and wins obviously, then they claim that fighter was a cherry pick, then repeat.
     
  10. BetterThenYou

    BetterThenYou Active Member Full Member

    838
    0
    May 21, 2014
    I see. So you dont think it matters who he fights. eg If he had fought and beat pac in 09 there would be an excuse. If he fought an undefeated cotto there would be an excuse. Margo - an excuse. Williams - an excuse.
     
  11. M.3

    M.3 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,196
    355
    Mar 21, 2014
    True.. Then when all the boogeymen are gone they go up in weight.. No one around his weight can challenge him, so he's scared to go past his body's limits and move to mw to fight the #1 mw...
     
  12. MrPR

    MrPR Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,197
    34
    Mar 23, 2009
    Bernard Hopkins currently has the best resume in boxing today . No ones touching his resume .
     
  13. El-blanco

    El-blanco Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,241
    0
    Apr 28, 2014
    Outside of earlier in his career, full credit for fighting corrales and Castillo twice, he has strategically picked opponents for their weaknesses and capitalized on them. Pacquiao does the exact same thing fighting guys at catch weights, their handlers know exactly when to make fights with big names and how to put them at a disadvantage.
     
  14. modernfonzie

    modernfonzie Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,595
    8
    Aug 25, 2013
    Floyd isnt a cherrypicker. The problem is that people want to see him lose, and when someone doesn't lose, all you can do is question opposition. Thats all thats left. Barely any bad fighters on his resume. No bums. Just A & B fighters.
     
  15. M.3

    M.3 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,196
    355
    Mar 21, 2014
    Everyone has weaknesses.. Since they all don't have the same weaknesses, there's no way to say that.. It's not like a fighter will look at a guy and say 'there's no way I can beat that guy so I want to fight him'.. If you fight someone and don't exploit their weaknesses, then you shouldn't be fighting out need a new trainer...