Pernell Whitaker vs Aaron Pryor At 140

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by sas6789, May 22, 2014.


  1. sas6789

    sas6789 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,666
    108
    Sep 15, 2011
  2. timmers612

    timmers612 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,018
    416
    Sep 25, 2005
    I was a big Pryor fan but believe he would hardly be able to touch Pernell while I see Whitaker catching Aaron throughout, not unlike his second bout against Chavez.
     
  3. Xplosive

    Xplosive Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,422
    10,135
    Jun 23, 2008
    Ummm...... I wasn't aware that Whitaker fought Chavez twice.

    As for this matchup, I can NEVER decide who I think wins.

    Half of me thinks that Pryor's awkwardness, quickness, and activity level would be enough to beat Whitaker.

    The other half of me believes that Whitaker was such a genius, that he could negate Pryor's style, and outbox him.

    Gun to my head......... I think I'd take Whitaker.

    Would I bet it on either way though? Hell no.
     
  4. SILVER SKULL 66

    SILVER SKULL 66 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,714
    47
    Oct 6, 2013
    Pryor would kick his tail, his workrate, freakish stamina, and tenacity would give Pea hell on earth, ALSO WHITAKER DOESN'T HAVE THE PUNCH, POWER, to keep Pryor off him...

    Let's be real Pryor brutally KOD Arguello 2x and he was a helluva lot bigger and better than Whitaker...

    In a 15 rounder the Hawk stops him late..
     
  5. Xplosive

    Xplosive Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,422
    10,135
    Jun 23, 2008
    This is an ignorant post. I'm quite possibly THE biggest Aaron Pryor fan on this forum. Pryor was an AWESOME fighter. He really was. But there's NO fighter in history below 147 that's beating a prime Whitaker easily. It just isn't happening. If ANYBODY could negate Pryor's style, it'd be Whitaker.

    Arguello was NOT better than Whitaker. ESPECIALLY not the older version that Pryor fought. Plus, two completely different styles.

    Whitaker-Pryor is a close fight either way. Neither man is getting stopped.
     
  6. Stevie G

    Stevie G Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,260
    8,844
    Jul 17, 2009

    For most of the bout I see Whitaker's movement and counters negating Pryor's offence. The Hawk would definitely have his moments but not enough of them to win the fight.


    Whitaker by clear points verdict.
     
  7. Thread Stealer

    Thread Stealer Loyal Member Full Member

    41,963
    3,446
    Jun 30, 2005
    I think Whitaker's skills and smarts would enable him to win a decision.

    Whitaker had an excellent workrate himself in addition to his great defense and jab.

    "Arguello a lot bigger and better than Whitaker?" WTH???!!!
     
  8. KuRuPT

    KuRuPT Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,462
    2,818
    Aug 26, 2011
    What drugs are you on? Please don't use and then post.
     
  9. Brixton Bomber

    Brixton Bomber Obsessed with Boxing banned Full Member

    21,934
    6,105
    Sep 21, 2013
    This is one of those fights where you could sit around for hours and still not coming up with a definitive answer...

    I will say this, though, You would NEED to have the workrate of Pryor in his prime to beat 'Sweet Pea' and you'd need to be a defensive genius who use's his defense as offence to beat a prime Pryor.
     
  10. salsanchezfan

    salsanchezfan Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,803
    11,440
    Aug 22, 2004
    It's a good matchup, interesting question.

    Time and again throughout his career, Whitaker was matched with someone I thought would be THE guy to finally unseat him.........Mayweather was too powerful and experienced......Nelson too gritty and well-rounded......the 140-pounders would surely be too big for him.......Chavez was a legend, nobody beats a legend.........McGirt could match him move for move, surely.......Vasquez was too big and strong, no way Whitaker could take HIM.

    My hopes were dashed each time. I see no reason to fool myself again. Whitaker by decision.
     
  11. Vanboxingfan

    Vanboxingfan Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,591
    255
    Feb 5, 2005
    If it goes the distance I'd predict a Whitaker win by about 3 rounds, if there's a stoppage, I'd say it was Pryor who got it. But since the most likely outcome is a decision, I picked Whitaker.
     
  12. JLP 6

    JLP 6 Fighter/Puncher Full Member

    1,866
    31
    Sep 24, 2010
    There was nothing ignorant about that post.

    I am NOT a Pryor fan because he has no style to his game but, he fights all out. He ran straight at Arguello and took that hardest punches ever landed in the 140 weight class and laughed and put Arguello on the mat. He ran right out and destroyed and I mean destroyed Cervantes. The freakin' HAWK!!!

    Now, here comes Pernell Whitaker who has one fight at 140 against Pineda who was discouraged after realizing that he was not going to hit Whitaker with one shot and get rid of him. Pineda is not on the level of anyone worth mentioning especially prime Aaron or Arguello or even Kostya Tszyu.

    Now understand...Pryor will never get discouraged, never stop punching, never reason, never understand, never get on the same page, with the calculator Pernell. Pernell will be on the bike and never get off and lose buy a wide margin or get KO'ed that that is.
     
  13. JLP 6

    JLP 6 Fighter/Puncher Full Member

    1,866
    31
    Sep 24, 2010
    Whitaker would be beaten convincingly. Does not have to be easy. Whitaker cannot do anything with Pryor. Nothing. Pryor is a hurricane. Arguello was better and beat better fighters than Whitaker (Olivares). Whitaker would be in up to his ears with Arguello at 140.
     
  14. heerko koois

    heerko koois Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,289
    18,038
    Apr 26, 2006
    it depends on the dope....
     
  15. Clinton

    Clinton Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,255
    6,542
    Jan 22, 2009