My top 10 worst heavyweight champions of all time

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by SuzieQ49, Jun 17, 2011.


  1. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    65,926
    53,137
    Feb 11, 2005
    As champion, he had a very weak run. So following the semantics of the question, he is not a top 10 champion (as with Liston, also). I do think he is a top-10 heavyweight based on resume and doing well to defeat most of the important fighters over a long period of time. Those hopheads and middleweights were the best the boxing world had to offer and he dealt with just about all of them.
     
  2. The Long Count

    The Long Count Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,589
    9,162
    Oct 8, 2013
    Briggs, L. Spinks, Willard, Carnera, Foreman (94 version),
    Off top of my head would be top 5
     
  3. BillB

    BillB Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,757
    41
    Jul 23, 2011
    Floyd Patterson takes all 10 spots.
     
  4. heizenberg

    heizenberg Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,981
    285
    Nov 6, 2013
    George Foreman 1994 and Michael Moorer shouldn't be in this list. Foreman was still very effective when he captured the belt and Michael Moorer was very good.
     
  5. The Long Count

    The Long Count Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,589
    9,162
    Oct 8, 2013
    I have to disagree over Foreman. He received his title shot against Moorer soley on name value, he had just come off a loss to Tommy Morrison where he was handily outboxed. Then against Moorer he was clearly being dominated by a blown up light heavy, until the fateful 10th round. After the victory he avoided his mandatory who was Tony Tucker and was stripped of one of his two alphabet titles to take on the unknown and lightly regarded Axel Schulz of Germany. A fight in which he was widely believed to win easily turned out to be a gift deciscion as Schulz dominated the second half of the fight. His lone remaining alphabet realizing the deciscion was egregious ordered an immediate rematch of which Foreman denied, thus being stripped of his second and last remaing alphabet title. After that he went on to fight unknown Crawford Grimsley, lou Savarese and lose to Briggs (in a fight most Foreman deserved) hardly a noteworthy second reign.
     
  6. janitor

    janitor VIP Member

    71,984
    27,976
    Feb 15, 2006
    The way you evaluate a fighters credentials to be on this list, is you take away their heavyweight title winning fight (which is by definition assumed), and see what you have left.

    The fighters that should really have a place on this list, are the ones who really didn’t achieve that much outside of winning the heavyweight title.
     
  7. markclitheroe

    markclitheroe TyrellBiggsnumberonefan. Full Member

    1,821
    32
    Sep 14, 2013
    Leon Spinks
    Bruce Seldon
     
  8. heerko koois

    heerko koois Obsessed with Boxing

    25,199
    19,682
    Apr 26, 2006
    i don,t like this thread....all champions were once dedicated boxers.
    even Leon Spinks was in his short prime a very decent boxer ....
     
  9. Vince Voltage

    Vince Voltage Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,128
    1,425
    Jan 1, 2011
    I don't think Moorer belongs there. He was highly skilled, first guy to beat Holyfield. I'd put Ingo Johannson in there instead.
     
  10. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    65,926
    53,137
    Feb 11, 2005
    Second guy to beat Holyfield.

    Johannson was a very dangerous fighter. Underrated.