Joe Louis vs. Vitali Klitschko

You realy don't have a clue who Louis was do you?

 

you should go into politics elroy...i'm serious.
loads of politicians doing well for themselves who are just like you.

 

With respect Elroy, it is you who nobody is taking seriously.

For a start the majority of people have picked Louis to win this fight, but that’s not the worst of it for you. What pushes you even further to the fringe, is that most of the minority who voted for Vitally Klitschko do not agree with your assessment.

Most people who favour modern fighters do not question Louis’s power or technical brilliance. Most people who think that the Klitschkos would beat him, grudgingly acknowledge that he would pretty much beat everybody else around today.

It is your credibility that is on trial here, not anybody else’s.

Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence to back them up, and you are not coming up with anything at the moment.

 

At this point its pretty clear your just talking crap to get a reaction. I would have noticed it before but wasn't paying attention .. likely another guy w dual alias' on the forum and bored. Troll on.

 

Vitali would beat the breaks off of the windows chinned flat footed Louis. If he got dominated by little Schemling and Billy Conn imagine what Vitali would do to him.

 

His argument is valid. Just because there are exceptions to a general rule, doesn't mean the rule is methodologically useless.

In boxing size is an advantage. Are you going to argue against this general principle?

 

Are YOU going to argue against the most skilled boxer of all time beating a crude giant?

 

The mother of all threads is back.

 

Please let it die!

 

Byrd the fat,featherfisted,glass-chinned guy knocked this "athletic monster" vitali out.
Otherwise i think this athletic monster vitali had Nanrolone case.
Why?Because is he/was an athletic monster?He slow as hell otherwise
he looked good against unskilled,unathletic fat men.
But v.klitschko he never beat a skilled athletic decent fighter.
Joe Louis had only one big problem.His glass-chin but Byrd is
glass-chinned also a he beat vitali.

-The "quit thing" saved vitali klitschko from the bigger shame against Byrd.
-I don't care quitali's size he isn't shoes or basketball player.
The 5'11" fat,unathletic Chagaev beat the 7' Valuev.
And Valuev was a tougher fighter than quitali.
-Vitali never looked good when his opponent landed some decent punches.
And quitali klitschko' face was incredible ugly after some old out of shape Lennox Lewis' punches.Vitalis' skin quality is ridicolously crap.
-Basically vitali was a " punchin' bag beater".I think he enjoyed this fat
punchin' bag beating.

 

By you logic Valuev was better than quitali klitschko.
I think you forget C. Byrd.Byrd beat vitali klitschko.Your general rule
is crap destroyed by the fact.Try to accept the facts like a man
and don't behave like a hysterical ***** !

 

Do you laugh as you type this **** or are you pure stoic? God Blessed comedy if the latter is true.

 

Louis would have bad moments in this fight but he'd squeak through them and would at times hurt vitali , Louis late tko (cuts) and either fighter could be slightly ahead at the stoppage point

 

Louis an ATG no question, but I can't see a man giving away so much weight and size being able to get the job done. Vitali is bigger and stronger and no mug with a decent enough chin, in my opinion Vitali wins this - Sorry Joe.

But P4P Louis wins hands down and if they fought in modern times Joe would probably be a bit bigger than he was.

 

someone as moderately skilled as chris byrd (naturally smaller than lewis) made Klit Quit. Dread to think what someone as clinical as Louis does.