Why Are People Overestimating Frochs Win Over Groves?

no offense but its groves not ward. and he beat groves before

 

ward destroys froch again

now froch doesn't even mention ward because he knows there is no point

 

ward is retired, move to classic section for ward threads. :deal

 

is ward still fighting ?

 

p4p #2

deal with it :deal

 

Ward? Who the f is Ward? Lol

 

It was a good win and a mega fight in the UK. The first fight ended in controversy. A big deal should be made out of it.

 

He's not as good as Ward, but he has many, many better qualities than Ward in many other areas

just give the guy credit

how many times must he beat someone considered technically better before he gets credit?

 

World Amateur Championship Bronze medallist, that alone is not something you would think Froch could win, but add every other thing he has done in his career onto that and you have a spectacular career and a once in a lifetime fighter

 

Froch is wasting his time fighting Ward again. I am 150% certain Ward would easily beat Froch again.

 

Because it was a big fight, ended with a spectacular KO and it's only just happened so people are still excited and possibly drunk. Froch's wins tend to get a bit overestimated anyway, probably because he's often expected to lose.

 

So is Ward, and he knows he would get a LOT of money out of it too, which one do you think would be the main reason Ward would want to fight him again?

 

In a nutshell, notice the oxymoron here?

 

Yeah he one punched the man who batterd him for 6 rounds last time and looked like the world champion.

Today it was different.

 

The guy who beat beat froch in nearly every round :hi: