If Froch had controversial decisions....

Okay well in that case I would say... Yes Froch seems like the type of guy who would want to clear the air of any controversy. Saying that, if the fights happened now in the twilight of his career I assume he would want to take the fights that would make the most financial sense whether it be a rematch with the likes of Hopkins or a fight with someone totally different. The thing is with Froch he already has a loss on his record so it automatically makes his goals for his career different to that of someone like Calzaghe's. Instead of trying to retain an undefeated record (which he obviously cannot do any more) he has to try and build a legacy based on fighting the best opponents out there. So I don't believe he would be opposed to rematch any controversial wins.

 

Calzaghe never lost :good

Ward is a great fighter, Ward with one hand is a good fighter. Froch got absolutely schooled with one hand.

How did Froch do his first fight with Kessler? :think

 

Froch beats a former Commonwealth champion in a rematch of a fight he was losing and suddenly he's more accomplished than Calzaghe :roflatsch

These casuals!

 

Why did Reid not want to fight Calzaghe when Reid was champ?

Calzaghe won and didnt need to rematch Reid.
Why didnt Froch want to rematch Groves and have to have Groves go to lengths to get the rematch?
Silly questions

I notice you ducked this post above

 

Tell me about it. Its comical.
Its hardly different to when Calzaghe beat Starie, its just now people watch SMW

 

super joe 46 and 0 deal with it yanks, and next week boxing hall of framer, don't know if lacy has got in yet. and why rematch bhop so he can hold ,headbutt,foul and try to get joe DQ by throwing himself on the floor. Hopkins has done great things but at 105 years old he can only fight for 30 seconds a round and holds and fouls for the rest of it. I would rather watch andre ward and that's saying something.

 

Hell yes. He just proved it with his rematch against Groves.

 

Dirrell was robbed against Froch yet there was no rematch.

 

for every one controversial decision froch has at world level, joe has a dozen.

And whast more joes were blatantly early stoppages, not just controversial at all - they should have all been allowed to go on.

But then if they'd let Byron box on, joe would have picked up a loss, and W£rren loses a LOT.