Is Carl Froch the second greatest British fighter of all time right behind Lewis?

That's for you to decide.

 

I believe in hegemony for my place of birth without denigrating others. Is that such a terrible thing sir? :bart

 

Tyson Holyfield and Vitali are leagues above

 

well too late for you. Countries like Italy, Germany, Poland are also electing blacks in their parliaments.

 

Age dont matter with hopkins. How is he world champion eight years after getting beat by joe? Cant have been that bad if eight years later he is champ of the world. Think before you post.

Oh and froch got schooled by an injured fighter, the end

 

Current Hopkins is way past his physical prime. Through less puncher and takes less chances.

A prime youthful Hopkins will not have had problem with Calzaghe's activity.

**** the so called victory you guys brag about was a split decision to Joe that could have gone either way.

 

Too bad for you because the Italian population denigrates the blacks in political power as we speak.

They were not elected, they were put there by the government.

Being born in Italy myself, I couldn't help but notice that they don't think too highly of colored folks.

Same thing in Germany (although it's against to say anything against it because it would probably entail prison time).

All of the black politicians you speak of belong to liberal parties which are rapidly fading away. :hi:

 

Well Rome wasn't built in one day. The same was the case in the United States but look who's sitting in the white house.:bbb

You have to start somewhere. Its just a matter of time.

 

Tyson was far more shot than Roy Jones, and Holyfield was way more past it than Bernard.

His win over Vitali was under very dubious circumstances.

 

Like the massive cases of voter fraud, and intimidation had nothing to do with his reelection, or an incompetent electoral college that had the vote substantially wider than the popular vote did.

 

Are you seriously saying that a person has to be able to trace his entire family back to the Anglo-Saxons migrations (5th, 6th century AD) or even earlier (the Celts, 1st milennium BC) .... to qualify as British ??

 

What a sore loser. Funny, Mitt Romney took his loss like a man and never made any excuses about voter fraud nor the electoral college. When it comes to presidential elections Obama is 2-0.

 

Will duh... considering that those specific people did create what we know of today as British society.

I wouldn't consider a white an African because that's their keepsake.

I'm fair, but firm. :bart

 

Nothing with being proud of who you are. It's human nature to feel hubris for ones own kind. Nothing laughable about that concept. :bart

And they don't just have to be white to be British, they have to be Anglo-Saxon, or Celtic.

A Pole for example, cannot be a Brit. :hey

 

You make a very good case.