Stiverne : " I hurt Wlad in sparring"

Unless he fights somebody else in Sept. You get ousted on that too.

 

Ha, I'm giving up a lot to make you commit to this.

I agree.

 

31-0 Wilder Troll?

This place creeps me out, I'm gone for the week.

 

rofl. Now I see why people hate Klitschko fans, you dense mother****er. I am a fan of his since 1996 olympics, and what I said needs to be read and re-read by you until it's meaning is clear.

 

He doesn't stand a chance against Wlad.

So many guys seem to claim to have got the better of Wlad in sparring yet nobody has managed to get the better of him in an actual fight. I take this with a grain of salt.

 

The only way Pulev can win is make it a dirty fight. If he lets Wlad hold him like Povetkin did the result will be the same. Pulev needs to hit Wlad below the belt when he holds.

 

Stiverne is delusional...... Lets not forget how Stiverne had trouble with a faded Ray Austin back in 11' Wlad on the other hand laid a prime Austin out in 2 rounds with no trouble whatsoever.

 

The problem with this era is that we don't really know how good the non-Klitschko fighters are. Haye's best win after losing to Wlad was Chisora. We could have seen how good he is by fighting Fury, but that never happened.

Thompson's best wins are over glass-jawed Price and Solis, who is a prime example of wasted potential.

Povetkin went life and death with Marco Huck, a CW, before fighting Wlad. His best win is Charr, who is extremely limited.

Wilder is still unproven, and there are still some questions about Fury. Fury has fought better opposition, but he didn't exactly look great against Chisora, Abell, and Cunningham. His upcoming rematch with Chisora should tell us more.

Stiverne has two wins over Arreola, but other than that, his resume is poor. No matter whether he or Wilder wins in their fight, they're both unproven.

 

wlads is not British
.

 

Wlad won't be able to lean down on his back and Pulev said he will do everything to win even if the refs are bribed.
This guy has a mean streak in him and i don't think Wlad wants no part of him.

 

I agree with most of what you are saying. I feel Thompson could have achieved his record and maybe even his ranking in any era. I also think the result of getting near the top would have been the same in almost any era.
The only problem I have is using Povetkins worst showing to define his career. Its kinda like saying that because Clay nearly got kod by Henry Cooper he isn't very good. But on the other hand there is your point about his best win being against Charr. If that's true, that is kind of sad. He did beat Eddie Chambers, but I felt that was more to do with Eddie gassing down the stretch than Sashas supperior skills. Even if he had beaten Chambers ass, that doesn't exactly set the world on fire.
Sasha was also able to smash an old fat Rah,an to bits as Hasim held onto the ropes with one hand and didn't move at all. What a triumph
Povetkin did win that gold medal fair and square though. I should comb through his pro record and see if I find anything truly impressive...

 

So if, for the sake of argument, there isn't much clinching or so called dirty tactics and Pulev comes into the ring healthy and strong yet ends up getting knocked out, would you say Wlad is much better than you thought or that you just over rated Pulev?

 

So you must be hated too cause you're a Klitschko fan, as you have stated
Watch out, logic will bury you

 

anything is good to put yourself on the map, if David Haye ever sparred Wlad the stories he'd have been coming up with afterwards would of been comical

 

:happy:happy:happy