I've seen this guy all over youtube, if it is indeed the same person. If not than it's a Foreman fan cult drinking the jungle kool aid made from Foreman's grill. Makes me look back fondly to the days of Foreman Hook and Combateo Heavy Hands, both moving on to CHB. :-( I still like this thread from way back when...http://www.boxingforum24.com/showthread.php?t=112813
How many rounds did it take Lewis to wear out a totally shot, way past it unmotivated, money grabbing, former wrecked shell of Tyson!?! Tyson by KO 5! :!:
This comes from a "money" steward/ w.klitschko/lewis fan:Tyson had always problem with taller fighters.Haha It's a pathetic Lewis propaganda. Yes Tyson had ALWAYS(all night, all day)... haha... This is the why the unexperienced Tyson destroyed the 6'6" Jaco and the 6'6" Richardson in the first round. Lennox lewis had problem with the tall fighters sometimes in his prime or nearly prime. He had big problem with V.Klitschko. He couldn't knock a skinny 6'3" below average Mavrovic out. He was impotent against the mediocre Akinwande. He was lucky against the tall Bruno. He had big problem against the mediocre Briggs in the first round. Otherwise i think McCall was absolutely lame against the tall fighters but knocked Lewis out easily.It was McCall one of the easiest fight. This prime McCall couldn't knock the 45!!! years old Holmes out. Holmes was competitive.It was a close fight. The 21 years old Tyson destroyed a 38 years old Holmes easily. "This always problem" propaganda blah-blah doesn't work against Tyson. I think some Lennox Lewis fans have problem with his memory. A post-prison,slow,mental-collapsed skill problematic Tyson won the first round against the prime Lewis.Can you imagine a prime stronger,faster more skilled Tyson against the glass-chinned Lennox?
It's funny because the slow Foreman never was impressive in a tough fight. (Ali,Young,Lyle,Stewart,Savarese,Holyfield) He was a slow featherfisted punchin' bag. The glass-chinned Alex Stewart humiliated Foreman's face.It was ridicolous.
You know what would be ridiculous? Watching Mike Tyson try to fight in his late forties. If he did that he'd either get KOd fast or quit before round 2.
C'mon VVWW you show the same extreme bias as those uncritical of Tyson. Like them, you even slam LL in his WINS, & for one example, it is absurd to say he was "impotent" against the love-fest Akinwande, Might as well say the same thing for Tyson vs. Bonehugger, or focus on him being rocked. briefly. Foreman was considered impressive against a PRIME Holyfield, certainly won tough fights even when Ancient, & you never heard of Lyle? Be honest with yourself; you ALSO just pick a side, identify with that fighter, & paint things black & white for them & against the ones you do not favor. Oh, & before you assume I am a mindless Lewis fan or something, while he was better overall/legacy, I pick Tyson at his peak to win.
Thank goodness Entaowed has come along to post a balanced view to this thread (even if I don't necessarily agree with picking peak Tyson over peak Lewis - I think it's nearly "pick-em" but I lean slightly toward LL). It's amazing how many threads involving Tyson, Lewis (& I must say Foreman too) become dick-measuring contests where the respective fanboys of said fighters do exactly as Entaowed describes in his last sentence of his second paragraph above.