Ingemar Johansen vs Cleveland Williams

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by janitor, Jun 13, 2014.


  1. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,357
    48,723
    Mar 21, 2007
    Yeah, I would certainly have Erskine and London above Cooper at that time. In fact Erskine beat him right after Johansson beat him (as part of a four fight losing streak) so it is pretty much beyond question.

    Cooper was nobody. He went 1-3 that year.
     
  2. edward morbius

    edward morbius Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,986
    1,263
    Sep 5, 2011
    Yes, but basically to pretty good fighters. Bygraves and Erskine were British Empire champions.

    I wouldn't want to overplay Cooper, but he was a young fighter on the way up, already had wins over London and Bygraves, and would be a ranked heavyweight seven times in the future.

    He is being compared to Miteff and Daniels.

    Miteff as basically at the end of the road, and would lose 5 of 7 that year, including a KO defeat to someone named Ray Batey.

    Daniels came into the first Williams fight at 18-1 having lost only to Ali and might have looked like a comer, but he was to go on to a 2-14-1 run, becoming something less than a trial horse.

    I can't see rating these fellows above Cooper, even granting that Cooper hadn't gotten his legs under him yet in 1957.
     
  3. choklab

    choklab cocoon of horror Full Member

    27,674
    7,658
    Dec 31, 2009
    Agreed. If Cooper was nobody when ingo beat him then Terrell was nobody when Williams beat him. I can live with that.
    This still leaves the chilling knock outs of Patterson and machen on ingo's resume who had never been knocked out before. As well as solid Euro wins over a decent bygraves, Franco cavicchi, London, Erskine, and neuhaus that are possibly superior wins than Daniels and miteff on Williams greatest hits list of two.
     
  4. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,357
    48,723
    Mar 21, 2007
    Obviously, that's not true. Cooper was 14-4 and had lost two in a row for 2-2 in his last four when he met Johansson while Terrell was 24-3 and had won four in a row.

    Most people would accept they are totally different sets of circumstances. But you're not most people ;)
     
  5. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,357
    48,723
    Mar 21, 2007
    Agree. But I was looking at Johanssson for a top 30 spot. It's not that type of resume really, is it?
     
  6. choklab

    choklab cocoon of horror Full Member

    27,674
    7,658
    Dec 31, 2009
    Terrell had already lost fights to bethea and twice to johny Gray. Williams was Ernie's first name opponent. Perhaps Cooper had been matched harder? I think Gray and bethea were bellow the standard of the men beating Cooper. At least Henry had already beat London and bygraves by that stage. Who had Terrell beat before losing to Williams?
     
  7. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,357
    48,723
    Mar 21, 2007
    When Cooper beat London, he was a prospect. That's fine because that's all that Cooper was too. London was being matched by guys with records like: 7-2; 1-15-4; 5-2.

    Meanwhile, Cooper was losing, by stoppage, to Peter Bates and Joe Bygraves.

    So he might have been matched tougher than Terrell. Certainly Terrell's victory over Lincoln right after his loss to Williams suggests he was significantly further on, but there is no way to say for sure.

    What we can say is that Cooper is less inexperienced, was brutally knocked out in his fight just before the Johansson fight, and that he would never be anything like as good as Terrell anyway.

    But I know there is no point in arguing with you - Sonny Liston beat Williams, which means you have to undermine him as a fighter at all costs in order to undermine Liston by proxy. Carry on.
     
    swagdelfadeel likes this.
  8. choklab

    choklab cocoon of horror Full Member

    27,674
    7,658
    Dec 31, 2009
    That's not why I am undermining Williams. I am pointing out things have to stack up better for Williams before he is given a chance at knocking out ingo. Personally I think it would be an entertaining fight, Williams was game enough to at least get up a few times.. but to actually warrant a chance at ingo he needs to be better than 0-4-1 against men currently regarded as world class if he's going against ingo who was 2-2 against fighters rated #1 and above.
     
  9. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,357
    48,723
    Mar 21, 2007
    But Williams inarguably has a "chance to knock out Ingo." Wait, are you trying to say that Williams has no chance to knock out Ingo? That's crazy.
     
  10. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,740
    Sep 14, 2005
    It doesn't matter what you think. The fact is Alex Miteff was ranked # 7 in the world when he fought Cleveland Williams.



    "Cleveland (Big Cat) Williams, who shattered the title hopes of 7th ranked Alex Miteff with a 5th round TKO, set up a howl today for a shot at champion Floyd Patterson. If Williams ever looked as though he deserved a shot at the title, it was Tuesday night. He took command of the fight from Miteff from the start, opened a bad cut over his left eye in the 2nd, floored him for eight counts in the 3rd and 4th, and was beating him badly when referee Ernie Taylor mercifully ended it 1:32 deep into the 5th." -United Press International


    After this bout, Texas Boxing Enterprises, the promoter of the bout, sent Floyd Patterson an offer of $100,000 or an option of 40% of the gate to meet Cleveland Williams.
     
  11. mattdonnellon

    mattdonnellon Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,635
    1,908
    Dec 2, 2006
    In the overall scheme of things Ingo's resumee is slight especially if we are talking top 30 or so. Very slight in fact.
    Williams resunee is non existant if we are talking top 100, I'm sure a few hundred fighters would match the Machen draw and the Terrell win.
    Ingo beat Floyd and Machen brutally and these wins are out of Williams stratosphere, not even close.
    Could Williams win, sure-is it likely? I don't think so.
     
  12. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,357
    48,723
    Mar 21, 2007
    Where did you put Johansson in the end?
     
  13. mattdonnellon

    mattdonnellon Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,635
    1,908
    Dec 2, 2006
    With this lot;
    26-50

    Baer M
    Byrd
    Chagaev
    Corbett
    Ellis
    Folley
    Godfrey
    Ibeabuchi
    Jackson P
    Jeannette
    Johansson
    Johnson H
    Lyle
    Machen
    McVea
    Moore
    Patterson
    Povetkin
    Quarry
    Spinks M
    Sullivan
    Terrell
    Tubbs
    Witherspoon
    Young

    Probably around 40ith. Like the fact that he never fought a fighter with a losing record-the only top heavyweight to do that, also beat very fighter he fought, but very poor longevity and a limited list of quality opponents. Feel he loses out by been a European at a time when nearly all the top guys were American.
    Then their is my subjectivity, I think he was a very savvy fighter and I rate that right hand up there with anybodies.
     
  14. choklab

    choklab cocoon of horror Full Member

    27,674
    7,658
    Dec 31, 2009
    George Chuvalo took his rating. Why would miteff remain #7 within a year he lost so many times?


    why would Patterson fight Williams over Liston??
     
  15. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,740
    Sep 14, 2005
    Once again, Alex Miteff was ranked # 7 in the world when he fought Cleveland Williams. This is a FACT. Deal with it.