The "All Things Mayweather/Pacquiao" Express!!!!!!

How do you figure that?

 

He ducked him. Face it. He waited until the right time to cherry pick him.

 

If Pac ducked margo, what does that make Floyd? Goosed?

 

I vowed long ago to stay out of these threads, but this one intrigued me for some reason. Not gonna read any of the comments, because in all likelihood it has devolved into the same boosheeee as the rest of the threads. I've criticized both and complimented both, but I have no dog is this fight.

But.....

I would say Guerrero was debatable as opposed to being a flat out cherrypick. It's easy to look back and say it was based on the result, but that shouldn't be how it works.

DLH was not a cherry pick for Pacquiao. He was supposed to get blitzed by DLH. Yes he was older and hadn't fought at ww in years, and looked like a zombie, but again, only hindsight is 20/20.

Cotto was not borderline for Pacquiao. He was a legit challenge. I hate catchweight fights, but it is an unfortunate reality in today's fight game.

 

Tell us some thing we don't know

 

Thank you for providing input without insulting someone.

 

atschatschatschatschatschatschatsch

 

Can we please keep merging threads into here

 

:deal

 

http://www.troll.me/images/ancient-aliens-guy/im-not-saying-op-is-a-******-but-op-is-a-******.jpg

 

i know steve kim mentioned it recently. dude has 3 failed drug tests that were swept under the rug and people ignore it. i knew he was juicing the day he came back from premature retirement and fought juan manuel. he was fast, accurate, "in the zone", like he never lost a step. he looked better than his fight before that when he fought hatton 2 years earlier

 

Here is on of the articles on his failed tests


http://www.examiner.com/article/floyd-mayweather-tested-positive-three-times

 

ktfo6

 

:deal