Jack Root fought Marvin Hart on the 3rd of July1905 they were contesting the world's Heavyweight title left vacant by the retirement of Jim Jeffries. I've no problem with Hart being one of the men in there he had a victory over Jack Johnson on his ledger,whatever the rights and wrongs of that decision may have been. My query is did Jack Root deserve to be in the other corner? Taking a look at Roots record up to then, he had the following results. Wdec George Gardner Wko8rd Jim Flynn Drew George Gardner L ko12rds George Gardner W10 Kid McCoy Wdec 6rds Marvin Hart Ltko 12 George Gardner W dsq over George Gardner At the time Root fought Hart, Jack Johnson had beaten ; Fred Russell Sam McVey x3 Joe Jeannette Sandy Ferguson x4 Joe Butler Morris Harris George Gardner Frank Childs Jim Jeffords Black Billx2 Denver Ed Martin x2 Anyone think he deserved Root's shot? Or, was it that he was perceived to have eliminated himself by not closing the show against Hart?
Johnson eliminated himself by being black. Root had only 2 losses, recently avenged, he had a victory over Hart, and folks thought he was a very good boxer/puncher. I think he had over 46 victories on his resume.
strange days.. Former World Heavyweight Champion Tommy Burns, while he was reigning champion, fought two men in one night in 1906 and both bouts were billed as for the World Heavyweight Championship. The opponents were James J Walker (0-5-0) and Jim O'Brien (0-1-0). Neither opponent had won a bout before their fights with Burns that night. Both matches received the only official sanctioning of their day, billing by the promoters and newspapers as being for the World Title. Burns won both bouts by 1st round KO. Neither of the opponents ever boxed again. http://boxrec.com/list_bouts.php?human_id=10744&cat=boxer
i actually looked it up and newspaper reports said they didnt have a win between them...i'll see if i can find again. you're right to question boxrec though.
And we thought boxing world titles were a joke these days. Boy, were people who paid to watch those "world title" fights ever hoodwinked out of their hard-earned.
That's friggin awful. Wow. Yeah, if you find a link to it, I would appreciate sharing that with me/us. I've seen that on boxrec but I just assumed it was due to partial records that were too hard to verify yet. Never thought they actually got title shots with no-win records. People are having an (understandable) sh*tfit over Danny Garcia's next fight as we speak. This is so much worse than that. Hard to believe.
Fortythree fights, 2 losses, 3 draws,2 no contests. So 36 wins. The two losses and one of the draws were to Gardner.Johnson beat Gardner over 20rds dropping him twice ,which of course you already know.
ah...now i say it i cant find newspaper reports....maybe it was here i seen about not having a win between them....and the writer maybe went with boxrec records as gospel.. http://www.eastsideboxing.com/weblog/news.php?p=5589&more=1
If memory serves me right, Root was the favourite in the Hart fight. He was definitely up there with O'Brien, Johnson, Hart and Gardner as the public stand outs. Hindsight isn't kind to his case but at the time he was a decent pick.
Johnson had comprehensively beaten Gardner dropping him twice in1902 when Jack was not much more than a novice. Gardner had kod Root twice , drawn with him twice ,and losing twice. Gardner definitely should rank below Johnson in1905,Johnson hadnt lost a fight in 4 years. Three months before Root fought Hart for the vacant title O Brien lost to middleweight Hugo Kelly.