Saul Alvarez vs. Erislandy Lara RBR

:good

 

would you call this a robbery IB?

 

9-3 lara i had it lol........am i crazy?

 

You need glasses mate

 

No, that would mean that you simply do not know anything about boxing

 

Some fights remind me of abortion and death penalty debates. It's impossible to get people all on the same side and the debate will never end.

 

:thumbsup

It was fun. Both fighters found different ways to adapt to what the other fighter was trying to do. I'd watch a rematch, that;s for sure.

 

So true, So true

 

STFU, this type of whining always happens when you morons don't get the scores you want.atsch

 

A fight this close can't be a robbery.

Lara could have won clearly if he threw more punches but he didn't.

Very hard to score given the differing styles.

 

Shitty is too harsh.
If the wide card was 115-113 (or 116-112) for Canelo the result would be the same SD. We've all seen many bouts where 2 of the 3 judges cards are close to one another, and the third card isn't. We've all seen worse divergent scores.

 

Lara fought a pro fight with an amateur game plan.

That's how a fighter who is way better than his opponent gives him the fight.

Alvarez didn't deserve to win. He barely landed a clean shot and was looking stupid most of the time.

Lara deserved to lose more though. That was not boxing, that was running. There is a difference. At no time did Lara appear to be trying to pile damage onto Alvarez. He looked like he wanted to show he was the better boxer, which he did. But you don't win fights by being better, you win by fighting better.