**last night scoring , a set back for great defensive boxers in history**

How many punches where thrown by each fighter?

I mean does Canelo winning set back great defensive boxers if he made Lara miss almost as much has Lara did him?

 

lara landed more

 

10 more punches, if we go by compubox, but feel it doesn't take into account how well the punches land.

Canelo is good defensively when coming forward and thus both guys where made to miss a lot, needs to improve his footwork though.

 

it does, and canelo body punches are overrated, lara jab that controled the distance underrated. also u siad canelo landed but less, in seven whole rounds.

 

i still dont agree but i respect your opinin

 

Last night people decided that getting repeatedly punched to the body was defensive wizardry. A sad day for boxing.

 

Both guys landed a similar amount yet Lara is called a defensive great fighter and Canelo not :huh.

 

would that be comparable to posters who get censored on this forum for dissing the credibility of boxing by virtue of dodgy federations?

or would that only be relevant when moderators decide that deleting is easier than debating?
that's happened to me twice in recent times, and it was nothing in the big scheme of things...but it became something when stuffy (and perhaps ***-deprived) mods turned something "irrelevant" into something much bigger

not going to let this rest just because one - eyed mods want to be small-minded....
(I don't think this had anything to do with you, but 'the professor' must be the ***-starved individual I am talking about since he's been impotent when it comes to replying to my query)

 

I got moderated for replying to a thread that was above board, and i replied being critical on the sport by virtue of the federations which collectively serve exactly that purpose

my post got deleted. it bugged me for a couple of weeks to the point where i sent a message to 'the professor' - that was ignored (i know that because he had dished out bans in the meantime), and so i started a thread asking if this had happened to anyone else.

it wasn't abusive but it was to the point. it got deleted.

I've never made an alt, i don't hate on posters, and my record should show that since I've been posting on here.
i have no problem at all if anyone disagrees with anything i have to say, but my point of view got shut down purely because someone didn't like it.

that's my call on what happened - i'd be more than happy to stand by that.
it was just really disappointing to get censored based on someone disagreeing with what i had to say, rather than anything else.

thanks in advance for any feedback.
it'll be the first time

EDIT : i'm not here to make the job harder for you guys - i was posting a valid point and i wouldn't have pursued it if i thought i was wasting your time

 

regardless, i appreciate you replying
this is the first time I've had issue with them, and i know i'm in the right.

being shut down for a difference of opinion only pisses me off because i can't get one word from anybody

 

thats not how the internet works!