1- lara...obviously. he just did it last weekwith relative ease. 2. andrade. canelo would be target practice 3. cotto. getting long in the tooth, but still too experienced and wily for canelo...also a little more complete as a fighter 4. golovkin. still unproven...but good enough at this stage 5. kirkland. it would be a war, but kirkland's aggression and power would take canelo out. maybe's 6- tim bradley.
Your #1 guy is Lara? He just got beat by Canelo. If you think Lara beat Canelo with relative ease, then do judges scorecards mean anything to do? By your definition, even if someone loses a decision, he still beat the winner anyway if you say so? I know that judges decisions can be controversial and debatable, but to act like Lara beat Canelo with relative ease is just absurd. Lara had a very serious cut and got knocked down by Canelo with a jab, but it was ruled a slip. For a guy to run away for half the fight, to get seriously cut, to get knocked down by a jab, to get brutalized to the body in a way rarely seen in boxing despite wearing the biggest and highest belt since Dawson Ruiz, then for you to act like it was a walk in the park for Lara.
He just beat Lara, which means he could probably beat Andrade. Andrade got dropped by Vanes, questionable chin Canelo would check. Canelo win. Cotto would get beaten down and retired by Canelo Canelo would get beaten down and ruined by GGG Kirkland may do well, if his chin doesn't let him down, which it probably will.