why do you support floyd ?

People hate him for what they think they know. The same Pac fans who say they don't support Floyd because he's "misogynistic and ghetto" are the same ones who support Pac through his alcoholism, infidelities, prostitution involvement, and gambling. It's all the same. No one is perfect.

I'll support him because that's my decision. You guys hate him to fit in.

 

But of course you support this behavior that is not accepted by normal civilized people because you're a person from the ghetto, and this type of behavior is condoned by your kind and even encouraged and endorsed:-(

 

Ruslan is a C fighter. Bradley is a top 5 Welter. And Maidana is a top 5 welter too.

Manny doesn't have a dominating win over Dinamita, and not even a non controversial win over Dinamita. There's an argument that can be made for Pac really be 0-4 against Marquez. So don't put him on his list of accomplishments just because he's been in the ring with him.

And he fought Morales off a loss to Raheem, instead of fighting Raheem. Just stop.

 

I'm from the ghetto, and I've made it out the ghetto. I've definitely accomplished more than you in life, especially since you get some kind of thrill and satisfaction from being racist on the internet. Your posts display you as everything but classy.

All I see from Floyd is hard work. That's it. Hard work that pushed his goals into fruition.

 

So you support people based solely on you "personal feeling"??:huh

You didn't vote for Obama by any chance did you...:roll:

 

I support people from a combination of personal feeling, and research, and/or relating my personal situations, to their own on some level.

I don't vote.

 

I will say B + I mean he did just walk through Mike Alvarado not to long ago .


And there is no argument that can be made where he is 0-4 he's won his share ..You can spin it all you want .

And what so Raheem beat him because he was slick no one thought Manny was steam rolling through him and if you really want to go there than how does Floyd's win over Herandez look when before his fight with Floyd he quit against Oscar

So I guess we can discount that win as well.

 

But you just said this:

So you contradicted yourself from one post to another....initially you said you don't go by what you read or see.....doesn't that constitute as a form of research? Then you said you only go by "personal feeling", and later said you go by research + personal feeling.....so which one is it?:nut

 

Oscar beat Hernandez THREE years prior to him fighting Floyd. 95 and 98.

I'm not spending anything. Realistically, it should be 2-1-1 Marquez. If you guys want to say Pac should realistically be 2-0 against Bradley (as he should)

First Fight Draw, Second Fight Manny Win, Third Fight, should have been a clear Dinamita win, 4th fight Dinamita KO.

All 4 of those fights could have been Dinamita wins, when only 2 of them can be Pac wins. the first and the second.

Mike Alvarado is ANOTHER C fighter. That's no accomplishment. He lost to Rios, another C fighter.

 

Once again, your low IQ on display.

Research and common gossip are two different things. If someone who had no history of the sport, came on this forum, they'd hate Floyd too. With all the "woman-beater" **** going around. Researching, and listening and WATCHING the grapevine are two different things. You jerk.

Researching the actual history is different that reading and seeing the bias comments posted by some idiots.

 

Still doesn't take away from the fact that Manny has the better resume and that's why I support him over Floyd ..Manny tries to proves he's the best Floyd calls himself the best but won't fight his best possible opponent !

 

G.Hernandez had a dominating run at SFW after losing to Oscar at LW I believe he went unbeaten for 2/3 years afterward. Pacquiao fought Morales three times coming directly off a loss. And and very big argument can be made that Marquez is 4-0 vs Pac he has a better argument than Pac does saying he won twice

 

So an official DV conviction is just gossip?:huh