The Myths of Heavyweight boxing

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Peril, Jul 23, 2014.


  1. HerolGee

    HerolGee Loyal Member banned Full Member

    41,974
    4,027
    Sep 22, 2010

    you said he didn't become great, and that I agree with.

    but its not because of wlad. its because he reached his thirties without doing anything except getting a medal. If Amir Khan et all did that they would be derided. POvetkin shouldn't get a free pass from that derision.

    even into his thirties, all he landed was the wba's consessionary losers belt - which is not a world title however you look at it.

    Fraudley Harrison has managed a bogus world title too, and he aint special.
     
  2. Peril

    Peril The Scholar Full Member

    9,183
    664
    Jan 6, 2011
    We can even try to connect the dots here with the lower weights : Floyd and Manny avoided each other like plague, beat up inferior opposition and established themselves as greats. Heavyweights can only run from each other for so long...there aren't multiple weight classes, catch weights or backdoors. They have to fight each other eventually, and if there is one man better than you, in the public's eye you will never be great. That is what happened to Povetkin, he fought the best in the world, and he lost.
     
  3. Peril

    Peril The Scholar Full Member

    9,183
    664
    Jan 6, 2011
    Do you really see anyone hindering him from becoming great aside from Wlad? Is there a heavyweight that you would bet your hard earned money on against Povetkin? he had one bad performance against Huck, when he was in emotional mess with his father passing and his trainers constantly being changed, but other than that his career was a strong showing of a superbly talented heavyweight, a little long in the tooth but very good nonetheless.
     
  4. madballster

    madballster Loyal Member Full Member

    37,211
    6,764
    Jul 21, 2009
    Exactly. When you had fat 45 year old George Foreman fight former LHW Michael Moorer Americans claimed the 90s was entering a new golden era :rofl:rofl:rofl

    Most Americans can't find Europe on a map nor spell any other country names than USA, Canada or Mexico. They're some of the least educated people on the planet. They automatically conclude that if none of their own fighters are in the top 10 in a division then that must mean the division is utter crap.
     
  5. HerolGee

    HerolGee Loyal Member banned Full Member

    41,974
    4,027
    Sep 22, 2010

    hes never been very good since his gold medal win. Along the way he lost it.
    The man was last seen fighting Charr, post world title fight. That's freaking deplorable, Charr is an unskilled nobody whose name is only heard because the Klits don't mind pissing on their fans these days.
     
  6. Peril

    Peril The Scholar Full Member

    9,183
    664
    Jan 6, 2011
    Wba paper belt is nothing special, but Povetkin beat Chagaev for it, that's what made it legit in my eyes. Povetkin was undefeated prior to facing Wlad, which is my main point: he faced quality opposition and he beat everyone, except the current atg dominant fighter. Unless Povetkin starts losing to random no namers like that guy Wlad just knocked out (the one that beat Boytsov), I will keep considering his career a success. He just happened to be in the wrong place at the wrong time.


    PS: Fradley is a very technically sound fighter, with a textbook right hand and physical gifts like a hercules. Its really too bad that he ended up being a mental midget, but judged purely on technical skill, Audley is a standout.
     
  7. UnleashtheFURY

    UnleashtheFURY D'oh! Full Member

    72,833
    39,154
    Sep 29, 2012
    I think the HW division is pretty underrated in terms of talent and depth. Is all of that talent being put to use properly? No, obviously not, but things are definitely picking up.
    Contenders are facing each other again, and not just waiting for their shot at Wlad.

    We've seen unlikely stars break through. Who expected Takam to give Mike Perez a run for his money, and arguably beat him? I sure as hell didn't.... Then he proved it wasn't a fluke by schooling Thompson(near shut out) There have been some pretty nice fights this year as well.... Glazkov/Adamek, Cunningham/Mansour, Arreola/Stiverne II just to name a few, those were very entertaining fights.

    Been a great year as well as very promising year so far, and it still isn't done yet. already this year we've seen......

    Takam/Perez
    Jennings/Szpilka
    Povetkin/Charr
    Stiverne/Arreola II
    Glazkov/Adamek
    Cunningham/Mansour
    Solis/Thompson
    Takam/Thompson
    Wlad/Leapai

    Upcoming fights.

    Wlad/Pulev
    Stiverne/Wilder(hopefully)
    Fury/Chisora II(hopefully)
    Perez/Jennings
    Fury/Ustinov

    Aside from noteworthy fights between contenders and prospects we've seen guys like Anthony Joshua, Joesph Parker, Charles Martin, Dominic Breazeale, Andy Ruiz, Jr. and Hughie Fury on the way up. Things aren't exactly as grim as the detractors/critics of the division would like to think.
     
  8. HerolGee

    HerolGee Loyal Member banned Full Member

    41,974
    4,027
    Sep 22, 2010
    wlad leapai and povetkin charr - if these are highlights to you then I am not sure what to say to tell you they plumb the depths of hw boxing.

    Both are prime examples of promising or decent fighters beating up absolute nohopers. these are what Tyson would be doing when he was supposed to be in high school repeating a year, not when you are at the height of your powers and accomplishments in your thirties, though I acknowledge Wlad had no choice in facing Leapai because the division was so bad.

    These fights would be nadirs of boxing in other eras, not great fights.
     
  9. Peril

    Peril The Scholar Full Member

    9,183
    664
    Jan 6, 2011
    It was a post defeat recovery fight, to test how the synergy between him and his new trainer worked out. What could be better than a guy with a great record, a solid chin and a large frame in preparation for the big guys of the division? Plus Char can bang (although some of his wins are very, very questionable).
     
  10. Peril

    Peril The Scholar Full Member

    9,183
    664
    Jan 6, 2011
    nevermind, just realized it wasn't addressed to me.

    I don't understand how you can call Klitschko a "promising or decent" fighter. Klitschko would be top 3 in ANY ERA, as ****y as that sounds. The only true measurement of conviction in your fighter is your willingness to have something to lose if he loses, and I would bet big money on him against just about anyone, except possibly Lennox Lewis and young George Foreman/Mike Tyson, which are his stylistic nightmares.
     
  11. HerolGee

    HerolGee Loyal Member banned Full Member

    41,974
    4,027
    Sep 22, 2010

    sure, KLitshcko is very decent at what he does, but a weak champion h2h, that's the truth of it, with the worst unrevenged losses of any 'dominant' hw champ.


    never top three, but that's another debate. The focus of my argument there is on the opponent, not Wlad himself.
     
  12. Peril

    Peril The Scholar Full Member

    9,183
    664
    Jan 6, 2011
    Leapai was a WBO mandatory. Wlad is fond of his belts and honors his mandatories, just like he is now fighting Pulev, his IBF mandatory. He dispatched of the australian in a timely, Mike Tyson manner, so how could anyone be critical of him? Ali, Tyson, Lennox, Holmes, they all occasionally fought bums (Ali had a whole streak of them, so did Holmes, Tyson was force fed terrified no hopers pretty much 12 a year).
     
  13. madballster

    madballster Loyal Member Full Member

    37,211
    6,764
    Jul 21, 2009
    You mean like Schulz - Botha, Holyfield - Bean or Lewis - Mavrovich were great matchups? Yes these shitty mismatches or joke fights happened in the 90s and were billed as 'title fights' in the 'oh-so-stacked 90s' :rofl:rofl:rofl
     
  14. UnleashtheFURY

    UnleashtheFURY D'oh! Full Member

    72,833
    39,154
    Sep 29, 2012
    Both are noteworthy fights, highlights or not. Wlad/leapai wasn't really a highlight for me, even as big Wlad fan(for obvious reasons) but Povetkin/Charr was for sure..

    Povetkin looked amazing. I haven't seen him like that in a long time, if ever. He looked in great shape and was also really aggressive, throwing lots of punches, good combinations - he looked excellent. Losing to Wlad was the best thing that could have happened to him, he's completely reinvented himself as a fighter. :deal
     
  15. HerolGee

    HerolGee Loyal Member banned Full Member

    41,974
    4,027
    Sep 22, 2010

    yep..but no. charr is NOT a live opponent. He doesn't even know how to box. he rushes in with his head down and arms out repeatedly. this is not boxing, its playground fighting.