Timothy Bradley or Canelo Alvarez: Who's the Better Scalp (???)

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Pookie, Aug 7, 2014.


  1. BagsWithDust

    BagsWithDust Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,734
    1
    Dec 18, 2009
    As of today I would say its the TB win for pac. BUT Canelo has a chance to keep making his career better which in turn will make Floyd's win over him look good no doubt. BUT it's a two way street, so if TB continues to do great things in his career then Pac's win will look good as well....
     
  2. pugs

    pugs Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,220
    3
    Dec 31, 2013
    But at the time Pac beat Bradley, he has already done many things. Timmy undefeated, prime/peak and top P4P fighter.

    At the tine Floyd beat Canelo, he was a bit green though undefeated. He has yet to match Bradley's feat and resume and Floyd needs a catchweight.
     
  3. Super Virgin

    Super Virgin Active Member Full Member

    588
    0
    Aug 6, 2014
    Thing is you Pac fans say Pac won the 1st fight and got robbed but then you say Bradley was #3 p4p for the second.
    That means you're counting the 1st Pac fight as a legit win for Bradley
     
  4. Imperial1

    Imperial1 VIP Member Full Member

    54,515
    121
    Jan 3, 2007

    :deal
     
  5. Staminakills

    Staminakills Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,329
    2,095
    Jun 8, 2012
    Canelo beat all the true contenders at his weight,
    Exactly who did Bradley ever beat at ww ??????

    Fyi Canelo is a way better fighter than Bradley.
    If they were to fight it would be labeled a joke and be 75/1 in canelos fake favor.
    Canelo has a way better offense and a way better chin.

    Tim does Nothing on par with Canelo. . Except get dropped and beat to **** by a d level fighter
     
  6. Chiko_Tech

    Chiko_Tech Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,637
    43
    Mar 6, 2006
    Canelo got hurt by a Cotto's D level former Superfeatherweight brother.
     
  7. Pookie

    Pookie Guest


    Does that mean Rustico Torrecampo gets credit for his KO victory over Pac?

    :think
     
  8. boxing_master

    boxing_master Loyal Member banned

    32,973
    14
    Jul 21, 2013
    canelo is nothing special...................he achived nothing...........

    bradley "beat" pacman and he also beat jmm
     
  9. alexthegreatmc

    alexthegreatmc Sound logic and reason. You're welcome! Full Member

    39,120
    1,801
    Sep 10, 2013
    They're the same size

    Both 5'6"
    67" Pacquiao, 69" Bradley.
     
  10. alexthegreatmc

    alexthegreatmc Sound logic and reason. You're welcome! Full Member

    39,120
    1,801
    Sep 10, 2013
    He was like 19 years old :rofl
     
  11. alexthegreatmc

    alexthegreatmc Sound logic and reason. You're welcome! Full Member

    39,120
    1,801
    Sep 10, 2013
    1) This post is very biased and it's obvious as ****. Casting Canelo in a negative light and calling him Drainelo.
    2) You could make a fair argument for both men. Timothy was the man at 140 but has only beat Provo at 147, in a fight a lot of people said he lost. He lost to Pac twice at 147. Canelo's best wins are against Trout and technically speaking Lara (I had it a draw, they both sucked) but I could see Lara winning that one.

    I think it really boils down to who beat them and how. Both are impressive wins, but to determine who's a better scalp, depends on who's the one collecting that scalp.
     
  12. Bald_Toad

    Bald_Toad Ring Title Full Member

    5,200
    5
    Aug 4, 2011
    bradley has wins over pacquiao, alexander, provodnikov, marquez, peterson and abregu. this isn't even a discussion.
     
  13. boxing_master

    boxing_master Loyal Member banned

    32,973
    14
    Jul 21, 2013
    he lost to pac ?
    who doesn't lose to pac these days except for jmm.................

    he also got a official win over pac and beat jmm that alone is a incredible resume.........
     
  14. STB

    STB #noexcuses Full Member

    15,486
    41
    Mar 26, 2014
    So we're just ignoring that Canelo is way bigger?
     
  15. alexthegreatmc

    alexthegreatmc Sound logic and reason. You're welcome! Full Member

    39,120
    1,801
    Sep 10, 2013
    I never said there was anything wrong with losing to Pac, my point was that he hasn't done anything relevant at 147, great fighter IMO. And his official win over Pac means squat because he lost. That is not incredible.