Ive changed my tune, but a valid point. PEDS have an effect on a mans long term health, KEnny surely wouldnt risk his sons....mind you he lets his son get punched in the face.....ummmmm
1) Not all PED's have adverse effects on health. Substance and dosage counts for a lot here. 2) I've seen some shitty, shitty dads in my day. 3) Using your own logic: If he believed PED's would help his son win via knockout instead of taking a prolonged beating, wouldn't he be ethically bound to give them since it's the option that would be least risky to his son's health?
The fact that Kenny Porter is lying saying he asked for the drug testing (all of a sudden, wonder how long it took for him to dream up that one) when everyone knows Matchroom demanded it is yet more prove the Porter camp are guilty.
Wrong. Unlike you I'm not a drug sympathizer and go back and look at my post on this thread after the Alexander fight before he was signed to fight Brook: [url]http://www.boxingforum24.com/showthread.php?t=494689[/url]. If Brook was juicing I wouldn't be a fan of his. I used to be a big Roy Jones and Shane Mosley fan before it came out that they cheat and now I wouldn't **** on them if they was on fire. The fact that you vehementley defend drug cheats in the sport and don't want a level playing field shows me what kind of fan you are. A Broner fan (i.e. child molester).
Floyd Sr would beg to differ He abused drugs himself so it's no isssue giving his son Floyd performance enhancing drugs and medicated needles to numb his hands along with letting PEDs to be used in his gym
