Super6?

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by RT7, Aug 10, 2014.

  1. RT7

    RT7 Active Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    512
    Likes Received:
    338
    :deal
     
  2. RT7

    RT7 Active Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    512
    Likes Received:
    338
    Even the above would be an improvement on what we've got, at the moment out of a LOT of fights how many do we get the real sense of anticipation? maybe 2 or 3 max a year
     
  3. Super Virgin

    Super Virgin Active Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2014
    Messages:
    588
    Likes Received:
    0
    The super 6 was good because when you think about it alot of them fights wouldnt have happened.
    The only problem was the gap in between the fights was too long.
     
  4. LeeJonesJnr

    LeeJonesJnr Active Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2013
    Messages:
    1,358
    Likes Received:
    3
    Agree that it was spread out over too long a time period.
    The problem is the finances. Ideally it would be on 3 or 4 shows with a couple of Super 6 fights on each and an undercard but the wages bill would be crushing.

    At the end of it there still wasn't an undisputed champion, which I believe was the aim, however with 4 belts to accommodate and not all the champions signed up that was never going to happen.

    It did give rise to some really good fights that probably wouldn't have happened otherwise (Froch v Taylor for example) and I would welcome repeats at different weights.

    My guess is that nobody other than the boxers really made any money or it would have been done by now.
     
  5. MCFC_EW

    MCFC_EW Active Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2014
    Messages:
    663
    Likes Received:
    102
    I wanted something similar but with Lee, Macklin, Barker and Murray
     
  6. GJM

    GJM Active Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2011
    Messages:
    627
    Likes Received:
    0

    It's always going to be a nightmare to manage at that level again. Super 6 got off the ground because they had a division with 6 decent fighters, none of which were tied up with any domestic TV rights issues. Not the easiest to find nowdays without running into a TR/Goldenboy/Haymon or Matchroom/Allegedly issue.
     
  7. cassiusbrit

    cassiusbrit Active Member Full Member

    Joined:
    May 30, 2012
    Messages:
    570
    Likes Received:
    0
    The Super six revealed Ward to be the number one in the division.

    It gave us the insight into the nature of Carl Frochs strength and willingness to fight anyone anywhere.

    It will have made money otherwise it would have been scrapped before the final.

    It will never happen again because its just too complected to achieve successfully given that promoters can make money the easier way.
     
  8. Geraldinho

    Geraldinho Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2012
    Messages:
    118
    Likes Received:
    0
    What about a group format like a World Cup. 4 fighters, 3 nights, co-main event each night. 3 points for a KO/TKO, 2 points for a decision and 1 point for a draw/NC. Top two have a rematch to decide the champ.

    Dream - mayweather, pacquio, khan, brook/porter
    HW - fury, wilder, stiverne, klitchko
     
  9. caligula4

    caligula4 Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2011
    Messages:
    2,764
    Likes Received:
    886
    I'd rather the fights just be made in a normal capacity.

    How many rounds a fight would your suggestion even be? As I wouldn't fancy a prizefighter type thing involving those guys at their stages of their careers.
    Better to see the best fights with the fighters in as peak fitness as possible and prepared.