The word is REFUTABLE you numbskull, you're looking dumber by the post, do yourself a favor and stop embarrassing yourself. Unless you're just an attention *****, in which case, you're doing alright.:good
You have no brains, that is an opinion of mine. Your mom is a 5lut, that is a fact. Want to know whats fiction? Guess.
You are probably right about that, since canelo fans swarmed this thread in a high rate just because I said it was a fact everybody got mad and butthurt. But there is nothing wrong with having a civilized boxing conversation right? I'm still baffled as to how many people got offended at me using the word fact in a very loose manner, yet these idiots assumed I was using the word in a very serious manner atsch And for the last time, it is my opinion off course, because other people's perceptions can be quite different than mine. And MY final opinion is that Canelo got outboxed by lara, is there something wrong with saying that? :huh
Canelo came out with fire in the last rd recognizing it was a close fight Lara came out flat thinking he had already won the fight and got outfought. Most people who have Canelo winning have him winning 7-5 in a razor close bout I don't think he dominated but given the style of opponent he did enough to win imo. Acting like Lara dominated with his jab fest is false but again that's why boxing is subjective I thought Canelo edged Trout/Lara so I rate him high for it if you think he lost both then you don't.
Fact isn't a word that can be used in a "loose manner" bonehead. It's fact or it's not. The FACT is that canelo won. Another FACT is that you THINK Lara won. If you stop making yourself sound stupid people will cease to talk to you like you're stupid.
I go Canelo by feeling since I didnt score it. I think he landed the better shots, specially to the body, and Lara only really outlanded him in 2 or 3 rounds. In the rest of them, I think Canelos aggression, effective punching opposed to Laras mostly jabs and running backwards won the Mexican the majority of them. Because of that reason I got the feeling Canelo was winning most of them. But I dont think a Lara win could be called a robbery or anything, same as the Canelo win cant be called one. The 117-111 card feels a bit like what I just wrote, but I dont trust my judgement as much as to think its actually correct. I think its pushing it way too far. Oh, and Im very happy for Canelo, because though the win wasnt dominant at all, Lara is one of the best boxers in the world and Canelo showed he belonged there with him, and he can beat him.